David Ruschena
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 4
- Law 3
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 2
- Criminal Law and Evidence 1
- Co-authors
- Paul E. Mullen (3 shared papers)Cameron Wallace (3 shared papers)Simon Palmer (3 shared papers)Chris Browne (1 shared paper)Stephen Cordner (1 shared paper)Olaf H. Drummer (1 shared paper)J. O. Barry-Walsh (1 shared paper)Christine Parker (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)Psychiatry Psychology and Law (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) (1 paper)SSRN Electronic Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
David Ruschena
7 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Clinical Psychology 396
- Psychiatry and Mental health 120
- Health 27
- Sociology and Political Science 126
- Speech and Hearing 16
Countries citing papers authored by David Ruschena
This map shows the geographic impact of David Ruschena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ruschena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ruschena more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Ruschena
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ruschena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ruschena. The network helps show where David Ruschena may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside David Ruschena, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 321 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 146 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 45 | |
| 4 | The Pressures of Billable Hours: Lessons from a Survey of Billing Practices Inside Law Firms | 2011 | 5 |
| 5 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 1 |
About David Ruschena
David Ruschena is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management, having authored 7 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper), Criminal Law and Evidence (1 paper) and Regulation and Compliance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (396 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations), Health (27 citations), Sociology and Political Science (126 citations) and Speech and Hearing (16 citations). David Ruschena has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul E. Mullen, Cameron Wallace, Simon Palmer, Chris Browne, Stephen Cordner, Olaf H. Drummer, J. O. Barry-Walsh and Christine Parker. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Psychology and Law, The Lancet, UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) and SSRN Electronic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.