David Reid
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Pam EnderbyTony RyanEdward E. WareMike NolanSheila PayneMarilyn RelfKaren FergusGerard H. De Haas
- Topics
- Elder Abuse and Neglect (5 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologySocial Science & MedicineJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
David Reid
38 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- General Health Professions 391
- Clinical Psychology 377
- Sociology and Political Science 286
- Social Psychology 282
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 211
Countries citing papers authored by David Reid
This map shows the geographic impact of David Reid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Reid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Reid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Reid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Reid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Reid. The network helps show where David Reid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Reid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Reid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Reid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Reid. David Reid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | Working together in adult safeguarding: Findings from a survey of local authorities in England and Wales | 2 |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 59 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 132 |
About David Reid
David Reid is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Health Information Management, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Elder Abuse and Neglect (5 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (44 citations), Clinical Psychology (377 citations) and General Health Professions (391 citations). David Reid has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pam Enderby, Tony Ryan, Edward E. Ware, Mike Nolan, Sheila Payne, Marilyn Relf, Karen Fergus, Gerard H. De Haas, David Field and Erin Dalton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.