David Regnier

931 total citations
34 papers, 646 citations indexed

About

David Regnier is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, David Regnier has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 646 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 17 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in David Regnier's work include Nuclear physics research studies (31 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (17 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (12 papers). David Regnier is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (31 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (17 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (12 papers). David Regnier collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Poland. David Regnier's co-authors include N. Schunck, N. Dubray, Marc Verrière, O. Litaize, Denis Lacroix, O. Sérot, J.-P. Ebran, Guillaume Scamps, Yukio Hashimoto and B. Yilmaz and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

David Regnier

31 papers receiving 620 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David Regnier France	14	583	274	214	140	48	34	646
J. Gehlot India	14	539 0.9×	262 1.0×	261 1.2×	134 1.0×	39 0.8×	65	562
E. T. Mirgule India	14	493 0.8×	90 0.3×	150 0.7×	207 1.5×	38 0.8×	53	520
S. V. Khlebnikov Russia	13	469 0.8×	109 0.4×	173 0.8×	193 1.4×	30 0.6×	59	526
M. Veselský United States	17	718 1.2×	243 0.9×	156 0.7×	147 1.1×	27 0.6×	54	742
I. M. Itkis Russia	16	746 1.3×	185 0.7×	166 0.8×	292 2.1×	29 0.6×	55	761
B. R. Behera India	13	499 0.9×	284 1.0×	229 1.1×	124 0.9×	16 0.3×	63	529
H. T. Nyhus Norway	15	514 0.9×	177 0.6×	245 1.1×	158 1.1×	13 0.3×	24	557
T. D. Newton Austria	7	334 0.6×	198 0.7×	209 1.0×	165 1.2×	85 1.8×	13	463
A. Ya. Rusanov Russia	13	512 0.9×	173 0.6×	145 0.7×	156 1.1×	45 0.9×	36	521
R. J. Casperson United States	14	485 0.8×	128 0.5×	187 0.9×	168 1.2×	29 0.6×	58	535

Countries citing papers authored by David Regnier

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Regnier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Regnier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Regnier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Regnier

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Regnier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Regnier. The network helps show where David Regnier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Regnier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Regnier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Regnier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Regnier. David Regnier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pillet, N., M. Anguiano, Philippe Carpentier, et al.. (2025). Impact of finite-range spin-orbit and tensor terms in Gogny EDF on structure and fission properties. Physics Letters B. 872. 140072–140072.

Dubray, N., J.-P. Ebran, Philippe Carpentier, et al.. (2025). HFB3: an axial HFB solver with Gogny forces using a 2-center HO basis (C++/Python). The European Physical Journal A. 61(10). 1 indexed citations

Regnier, David, et al.. (2024). Generative deep-learning reveals collective variables of Fermionic systems. Physical review. C. 109(6). 2 indexed citations

Regnier, David, et al.. (2024). Multiconfigurational time-dependent density functional theory for atomic nuclei: technical and numerical aspects. The European Physical Journal A. 60(1). 3 indexed citations

Pillet, N., et al.. (2024). Construction of Continuous Collective Energy Landscapes for Large Amplitude Nuclear Many-Body Problems. Physical Review Letters. 133(15). 152501–152501. 3 indexed citations

Regnier, David, et al.. (2023). Quantum fluctuations induce collective multiphonons in finite Fermi liquids. Physical review. C. 108(1). 8 indexed citations

Verrière, Marc, et al.. (2022). Building surrogate models of nuclear density functional theory with Gaussian processes and autoencoders. Frontiers in Physics. 10. 7 indexed citations

Verrière, Marc, N. Schunck, & David Regnier. (2021). Microscopic calculation of fission product yields with particle-number projection. Physical review. C. 103(5). 18 indexed citations

Regnier, David, et al.. (2020). Taming Nuclear Complexity with a Committee of Multilayer Neural Networks. Physical Review Letters. 124(16). 162502–162502. 65 indexed citations

10.

Verrière, Marc & David Regnier. (2020). The Time-Dependent Generator Coordinate Method in Nuclear Physics. Frontiers in Physics. 8. 38 indexed citations

11.

Lacroix, Denis, et al.. (2020). Combining phase-space and time-dependent reduced density matrix approach to describe the dynamics of interacting fermions. The European Physical Journal A. 56(4). 9 indexed citations

12.

Regnier, David, N. Dubray, & N. Schunck. (2019). From asymmetric to symmetric fission in the fermium isotopes within the time-dependent generator-coordinate-method formalism. Physical review. C. 99(2). 54 indexed citations

13.

Regnier, David & Denis Lacroix. (2019). Microscopic description of pair transfer between two superfluid Fermi systems. II. Quantum mixing of time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov trajectories. Physical review. C. 99(6). 18 indexed citations

14.

Regnier, David, N. Dubray, N. Schunck, & Marc Verrière. (2016). Microscopic predictions of fission yields based on the time dependent GCM formalism. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 111. 8005–8005.

15.

Materna, T., A. Letourneau, C. Amouroux, et al.. (2015). Fission studies by prompt gamma-ray spectrometry. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 93. 2020–2020. 1 indexed citations

16.

Regnier, David, Marc Verrière, N. Dubray, & N. Schunck. (2015). FELIX-1.0: A finite element solver for the time dependent generator coordinate method with the Gaussian overlap approximation. Computer Physics Communications. 200. 350–363. 24 indexed citations

17.

Litaize, O., et al.. (2014). Investigation of n+238U Fission Observables. Nuclear Data Sheets. 118. 216–219. 5 indexed citations

18.

Sérot, O., O. Litaize, & David Regnier. (2014). Fission Mode Influence on Prompt Neutrons and γ-rays Emitted in the Reaction 239Pu(nth,f). Physics Procedia. 59. 132–137. 6 indexed citations

19.

Regnier, David, et al.. (2013). Preliminary Results of a Full Hauser-feshbach Simulation of the Prompt Neutron and Gamma Emission from Fission Fragments. Physics Procedia. 47. 47–52. 18 indexed citations

20.

Dubray, N. & David Regnier. (2012). Numerical search of discontinuities in self-consistent potential energy surfaces. Computer Physics Communications. 183(10). 2035–2041. 65 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact