David R. Sandeman

907 total citations
32 papers, 684 citations indexed

About

David R. Sandeman is a scholar working on Neurology, Surgery and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, David R. Sandeman has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 684 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Neurology, 9 papers in Surgery and 8 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in David R. Sandeman's work include Meningioma and schwannoma management (8 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers) and Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (5 papers). David R. Sandeman is often cited by papers focused on Meningioma and schwannoma management (8 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers) and Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (5 papers). David R. Sandeman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. David R. Sandeman's co-authors include Semir Zeki, Nitin Patel, Seth Love, Stephen G. Bown, Hugh B. Coakham, Hugh Barr, Michael Lewin, Steven S. Gill, C. J. Tralau and R. J. Nelson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

David R. Sandeman

32 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David R. Sandeman United Kingdom 15 177 153 139 119 119 32 684
T. Cox United Kingdom 13 216 1.2× 80 0.5× 45 0.3× 78 0.7× 91 0.8× 19 676
Wilhelm Eisner Austria 14 184 1.0× 96 0.6× 95 0.7× 136 1.1× 38 0.3× 23 553
Howard J. Landy United States 18 296 1.7× 174 1.1× 98 0.7× 106 0.9× 138 1.2× 38 960
Alexander Ksendzovsky United States 15 151 0.9× 99 0.6× 73 0.5× 164 1.4× 50 0.4× 40 658
F. Zappoli Italy 15 135 0.8× 105 0.7× 94 0.7× 52 0.4× 160 1.3× 35 767
Elliott Friedman United States 13 156 0.9× 122 0.8× 139 1.0× 193 1.6× 62 0.5× 31 742
Christian Doenitz Germany 15 221 1.2× 237 1.5× 67 0.5× 64 0.5× 109 0.9× 40 835
Stephen Skirboll United States 16 255 1.4× 265 1.7× 47 0.3× 136 1.1× 58 0.5× 36 856
G. T. Plant United Kingdom 23 411 2.3× 75 0.5× 73 0.5× 76 0.6× 98 0.8× 50 1.5k
Rajan Patel United States 14 117 0.7× 152 1.0× 47 0.3× 71 0.6× 115 1.0× 64 833

Countries citing papers authored by David R. Sandeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Sandeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Sandeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Sandeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Sandeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Sandeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Sandeman. The network helps show where David R. Sandeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David R. Sandeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David R. Sandeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David R. Sandeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David R. Sandeman. David R. Sandeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sandeman, David R.. (2015). 15-year longitudinal study of mortality in a general neurosurgical practice. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 29(4). 500–504. 2 indexed citations
2.
Mortimer, Alex, et al.. (2015). Republished: Conservative management of a post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the artery of cervical enlargement–anterior spinal artery junction. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 8(4). e14–e14. 8 indexed citations
3.
Abhinav, Kumar, et al.. (2013). Use of robot-guided stereotactic placement of intracerebral electrodes for investigation of focal epilepsy: initial experience in the UK. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 27(5). 704–705. 29 indexed citations
4.
Sieradzan, Katarzyna, et al.. (2013). ROBOTIC STEREO EEG IN EPILEPSY SURGERY ASSESSMENT. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 84(11). e2.7–e2. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kause, Juliane, et al.. (2012). Team working. Care delivery model can ease winter pressures.. PubMed. 122(6326). 25–7. 1 indexed citations
6.
Ching, Jared, et al.. (2012). Long-term effectiveness and tolerability of vagal nerve stimulation in adults with intractable epilepsy: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 27(2). 228–234. 31 indexed citations
7.
Faulkner, Howard J., David R. Sandeman, Seth Love, et al.. (2010). Epilepsy surgery for refractory epilepsy due to encephalocele: a case report and review of the literature. Epileptic Disorders. 12(2). 160–166. 52 indexed citations
8.
Barua, Neil U., Adam H. Ross, & David R. Sandeman. (2007). Traumatic callosomarginal aneurysm following orbital gunshot wound in a 16-year-old girl. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 21(2). 237–238. 5 indexed citations
9.
Edwards, Richard, Timothy J. M. Moss, & David R. Sandeman. (2003). A syndrome lost in specialisation. The Lancet. 362(9395). 1541–1541. 1 indexed citations
10.
ffytche, Dominic, et al.. (2000). Human area V5 and motion in the ipsilateral visual field. European Journal of Neuroscience. 12(8). 3015–3025. 45 indexed citations
11.
McCarter, Renée J., et al.. (1999). An analysis of neuropsychological change scores following selective temporal resection of the non-dominant temporal lobe. Seizure. 8(4). 241–245. 16 indexed citations
12.
Patel, Nitin & David R. Sandeman. (1997). A simple trajectory guidance device that assists freehand and interactive image guided biopsy of small deep intracranial targets. Computer Aided Surgery. 2(3-4). 186–192. 13 indexed citations
13.
Patel, Nitin & David R. Sandeman. (1997). A Simple Trajectory Guidance Device that Assists Freehand and Interactive Image Guided Biopsy of Small Deep Intracranial Targets. Computer Aided Surgery. 2(3-4). 186–192. 8 indexed citations
14.
Carney, A. Simon, et al.. (1996). Intra-operative image guidance in otolaryngology – The use of the ISG viewing wand. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 110(4). 322–327. 24 indexed citations
15.
Hopkins, Kirsten, C Chandler, J. Bullimore, et al.. (1995). A pilot study of the treatment of patients with recurrent malignant gliomas with intratumoral yttrium-90 radioimmunoconjugates. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 34(2). 121–131. 38 indexed citations
16.
Marshall, C., et al.. (1992). Medical Robotics in neurosurgery: The potential of three dimensional (3D) Image guidance systems of intelligent manipulators. Explore Bristol Research. 1 indexed citations
17.
Jamjoom, Abdulhakim B., Nicholas Kane, David R. Sandeman, & Brian H. Cummins. (1991). Epilepsy related to traumatic extradural haematomas.. BMJ. 302(6774). 448–448. 6 indexed citations
18.
Sandeman, David R., P H Buxton, David Chadwick, et al.. (1990). The management of patients with an intrinsic supratentorial brain tumour. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 4(4). 299–312. 9 indexed citations
19.
Findlay, G., David R. Sandeman, & P H Buxton. (1988). The Role of Needle Biopsy in the Management of Malignant Spinal Compression. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2(4). 479–484. 8 indexed citations
20.
Sandeman, David R., et al.. (1986). The provenance of extradural haematomas.. BMJ. 292(6519). 522.2–523. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026