David R. Pieper
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 2%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John C. MarshallCatherine LobockiRichard R. GalaSandra RegianiJoyce A. DuncanMarappa G. SubramanianMarc FragerS. A. Tonetta
- Topics
- Stress Responses and Cortisol (15 papers)Circadian rhythm and melatonin (10 papers)Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
David R. Pieper
64 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Reproductive Medicine 380
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 249
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 246
- Behavioral Neuroscience 151
- Social Psychology 143
Countries citing papers authored by David R. Pieper
This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Pieper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Pieper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Pieper. The network helps show where David R. Pieper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David R. Pieper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David R. Pieper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David R. Pieper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David R. Pieper. David R. Pieper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | Ultrasound surveillance of the cervix in twin gestations: management of cervical incompetency. | 27 |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About David R. Pieper
David R. Pieper is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (15 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (10 papers) and Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (380 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (151 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (249 citations). David R. Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John C. Marshall, Catherine Lobocki, Richard R. Gala, Sandra Regiani, Joyce A. Duncan, Marappa G. Subramanian, Marc Frager, S. A. Tonetta, Jason Lichten and Sarah Winans Newman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, Brain Research and Endocrinology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.