David Pinner

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 545 citations indexed

About

David Pinner is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, David Pinner has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 545 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in David Pinner's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers). David Pinner is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers). David Pinner collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. David Pinner's co-authors include Lawrence J. Hall, Joshua T. Ruderman, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Anson Hook, Prateek Agrawal, Timothy Cohen, Hyung Do Kim, Lisa Randall, Nima Arkani–Hamed and Raffaele Tito D’Agnolo and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of High Energy Physics and Physics of the Dark Universe.

In The Last Decade

David Pinner

7 papers receiving 535 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A natural SUSY Higgs near 125 GeV

2012 328 citations Lawrence J. Hall, David Pinner et al. Journal of High Energy Physics profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David Pinner United States	5	512	328	10	10	7	7	545
Thomas Flacke South Korea	15	622 1.2×	201 0.6×	14 1.4×	12 1.2×	7 1.0×	32	625
K. J. de Vries Spain	8	454 0.9×	250 0.8×	6 0.6×	15 1.5×	10 1.4×	8	460
Sujeet Akula United States	8	358 0.7×	239 0.7×	6 0.6×	17 1.7×	6 0.9×	8	365
Daniel E. López-Fogliani Spain	15	636 1.2×	219 0.7×	12 1.2×	10 1.0×	8 1.1×	34	645
Ujjal Kumar Dey India	13	498 1.0×	215 0.7×	23 2.3×	14 1.4×	16 2.3×	39	521
Venus Keus Finland	12	378 0.7×	240 0.7×	4 0.4×	9 0.9×	11 1.6×	24	394
Andreas Hoecker Switzerland	3	462 0.9×	169 0.5×	11 1.1×	23 2.3×	5 0.7×	3	468
Kodai Sakurai Japan	12	380 0.7×	131 0.4×	10 1.0×	10 1.0×	12 1.7×	25	384
Rakhi Mahbubani Switzerland	11	459 0.9×	228 0.7×	5 0.5×	11 1.1×	18 2.6×	16	467
Linda M. Carpenter United States	15	578 1.1×	260 0.8×	22 2.2×	11 1.1×	15 2.1×	35	584

Countries citing papers authored by David Pinner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Pinner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pinner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pinner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Pinner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pinner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pinner. The network helps show where David Pinner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Pinner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Pinner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Pinner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Pinner. David Pinner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Agrawal, Prateek, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, David Pinner, & Lisa Randall. (2023). Rock ‘n’ roll solutions to the Hubble tension. Physics of the Dark Universe. 42. 101347–101347. 65 indexed citations

2.

Arkani–Hamed, Nima, Timothy Cohen, Raffaele Tito D’Agnolo, et al.. (2016). Solving the Hierarchy Problem at Reheating with a Large Number of Degrees of Freedom. Physical Review Letters. 117(25). 251801–251801. 94 indexed citations

3.

Henning, Brian, et al.. (2015). A keV string axion from high scale supersymmetry. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(4). 3 indexed citations

4.

Hall, Lawrence J., David Pinner, & Joshua T. Ruderman. (2014). The weak scale from BBN. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014(12). 31 indexed citations

5.

Elor, Gilly, Lawrence J. Hall, David Pinner, & Joshua T. Ruderman. (2012). Yukawa unification and the superpartner mass scale. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2012(10). 21 indexed citations

6.

Hall, Lawrence J., David Pinner, & Joshua T. Ruderman. (2012). A natural SUSY Higgs near 125 GeV. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2012(4). 328 indexed citations breakdown →

7.

Djerassi, Carl & David Pinner. (2003). Newton's Darkness. IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact