David Parker
- Surgery top 1%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Rheumatology top 2%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Myles CoolicanCorey ScholesSam OussedikCecil H. RorabeckSébastien LustıgBruno GiuffrèBrett FritschDarius G. Viskontas
- Topics
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (110 papers)Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (78 papers)Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (44 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineJournal of Bone and Joint SurgeryCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
David Parker
126 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Surgery 2.7k
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 656
- Biomedical Engineering 494
- Rheumatology 407
- Epidemiology 96
Countries citing papers authored by David Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of David Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Parker. The network helps show where David Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Parker. David Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | Public and private hospital total joint replacement surgery: any difference in outcomes? | 1 |
About David Parker
David Parker is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 138 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (110 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (78 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (44 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (656 citations), Surgery (2.7k citations) and Rheumatology (407 citations). David Parker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Myles Coolican, Corey Scholes, Sam Oussedik, Cecil H. Rorabeck, Sébastien Lustıg, Bruno Giuffrè, Brett Fritsch, Darius G. Viskontas, Sven Putnis and Antonio Klasan. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.