David N. Juurlink
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 0.2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 0.1%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 0.2%
- Surgery top 1%
- Co-authors
- Muhammad MamdaniTara GomesPeter C. AustinAlexander KoppDonald A. RedelmeierJ. Michael PatersonIrfan A. DhallaAndreas Laupacis
- Topics
- Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (78 papers)Poisoning and overdose treatments (38 papers)Pain Management and Opioid Use (36 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
David N. Juurlink
332 papers receiving 16.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 186
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4.0k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 3.3k
- Pharmacology 2.5k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2.3k
- Surgery 2.2k
Countries citing papers authored by David N. Juurlink
This map shows the geographic impact of David N. Juurlink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David N. Juurlink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David N. Juurlink more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David N. Juurlink
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David N. Juurlink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David N. Juurlink. The network helps show where David N. Juurlink may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David N. Juurlink
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David N. Juurlink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David N. Juurlink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David N. Juurlink. David N. Juurlink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Opioid prescribing is a surrogate for inadequate pain management resources. | 33 |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | The rise and fall of the thiazolidinediones: impact of clinical evidence publication and formulary change on the prescription incidence of thiazolidinediones. | 12 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 311 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 60 | |
| 20 | 419 |
About David N. Juurlink
David N. Juurlink is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 344 papers that have together received 17.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (78 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (38 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.9k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (2.2k citations) and Toxicology (727 citations). David N. Juurlink has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Muhammad Mamdani, Tara Gomes, Peter C. Austin, Alexander Kopp, Donald A. Redelmeier, J. Michael Paterson, Irfan A. Dhalla, Andreas Laupacis, Alex Kopp and Douglas S. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.