David M. Hix

1.2k total citations
47 papers, 885 citations indexed

About

David M. Hix is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, David M. Hix has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 885 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 28 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 20 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in David M. Hix's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (23 papers) and Forest ecology and management (18 papers). David M. Hix is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (23 papers) and Forest ecology and management (18 papers). David M. Hix collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. David M. Hix's co-authors include P. Charles Goebel, R. Gregory Corace, Craig G. Lorimer, Burton V. Barnes, Igor Drobyshev, Jeffrey N. Pearcy, Stephen N. Matthews, Elaine Kennedy Sutherland, John A. Witter and Louis R. Iverson and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Remote Sensing and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

In The Last Decade

David M. Hix

45 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David M. Hix United States	17	579	506	372	205	131	47	885
Randy G. Jensen United States	16	651 1.1×	583 1.2×	351 0.9×	190 0.9×	101 0.8×	36	960
Sybille Haeussler Canada	14	562 1.0×	549 1.1×	316 0.8×	298 1.5×	114 0.9×	21	940
Juan Manuel Cellini Argentina	18	625 1.1×	562 1.1×	266 0.7×	310 1.5×	144 1.1×	80	1.0k
Meredith W. Cornett United States	17	460 0.8×	468 0.9×	247 0.7×	168 0.8×	110 0.8×	27	765
Gary Kerr United Kingdom	18	867 1.5×	620 1.2×	235 0.6×	398 1.9×	199 1.5×	49	1.2k
Erik Andersson Sweden	3	646 1.1×	690 1.4×	202 0.5×	263 1.3×	105 0.8×	4	1.1k
Marc Gracia Spain	18	509 0.9×	631 1.2×	231 0.6×	93 0.5×	93 0.7×	25	869
Juha‐Pekka Hotanen Finland	15	374 0.6×	446 0.9×	310 0.8×	280 1.4×	162 1.2×	45	805
Tiina Tonteri Finland	15	390 0.7×	284 0.6×	251 0.7×	239 1.2×	165 1.3×	31	716
Steven P. Cline United States	12	309 0.5×	350 0.7×	331 0.9×	379 1.8×	137 1.0×	22	756

Countries citing papers authored by David M. Hix

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Hix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Hix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Hix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Hix

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Hix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Hix. The network helps show where David M. Hix may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David M. Hix

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David M. Hix. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David M. Hix based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David M. Hix. David M. Hix is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Goebel, P. Charles, et al.. (2020). Regeneration patterns of key pine species in a mixed-pine forest indicate a positive effect of variable retention harvesting and an increase in recruitment with time. Forest Ecosystems. 7(1). 6 indexed citations

Hix, David M., et al.. (2014). OHIO HARDWOOD SAWLOG PRICE TRENDS. Wood and Fiber Science. 46(1). 85–96. 3 indexed citations

Goebel, P. Charles, et al.. (2014). Fire history, fuels, and overstory effects on the regeneration-layer dynamics of mixed-pine forest ecosystems of eastern Upper Michigan, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 322. 37–47. 18 indexed citations

Corace, R. Gregory, et al.. (2012). Snag Benchmarks and Treatment Options for Mixed‐Pine Forest Restoration in Eastern Upper Michigan. Restoration Ecology. 21(5). 608–616. 6 indexed citations

Goebel, P. Charles, et al.. (2011). Do partial cross sections from live trees for fire history analysis result in higher mortality 2years after sampling?. Forest Ecology and Management. 262(6). 940–946. 2 indexed citations

Hix, David M., et al.. (2008). Adaptation of the QBR index for use in riparian forests of central Ohio. 24. 13 indexed citations

Goebel, P. Charles, et al.. (2005). Ground-flora composition and structure of floodplain and upland landforms of an old-growth headwater forest innorth-central Ohio¹. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 132(1). 62–71. 7 indexed citations

Goebel, P. Charles, et al.. (2005). Composition and Structure of Two Old-growth Forest Ecosystem Types of Southeastern Ohio. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University). 7 indexed citations

Goebel, P. Charles, et al.. (2004). Thirty-one Years of Stand Development in a Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra L.) Plantation, North-Central Ohio, USA. 1 indexed citations

10.

Goebel, P. Charles, et al.. (2003). Ground-flora communities of headwater riparian areas in an old-growth central hardwood forest. 234. 5 indexed citations

11.

Hix, David M., et al.. (2003). Gap characteristics of southeastern Ohio second-growth forests. 234. 3 indexed citations

12.

Weiskittel, Aaron R. & David M. Hix. (2003). Canopy Gap Characteristics of an Oak-Beech-Maple Old-Growth Forest in Northeastern Ohio. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University). 5 indexed citations

13.

Hix, David M., et al.. (1998). Influence of aspect and stand age on ground flora of southeastern Ohio forest ecosystems. Plant Ecology. 139(2). 177–187. 92 indexed citations

14.

Goebel, P. Charles & David M. Hix. (1997). Correlations among stand ages and forest strata in mixed-oak forests of southeastern Ohio. 188. 3 indexed citations

15.

Hix, David M. & Jeffrey N. Pearcy. (1997). Forest ecosystems of the Marietta Unit, Wayne National Forest, southeastern Ohio: multifactor classification and analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27(7). 1117–1131. 47 indexed citations

16.

Hix, David M., et al.. (1996). Composition and structure of a chronosequence of young, mixed-species forests in southeastern Ohio, USA. Plant Ecology. 125(1). 11–30. 8 indexed citations

17.

Hix, David M., et al.. (1993). Survival and growth of planted northern red oak in northern West Virginia. 161. 3 indexed citations

18.

Hix, David M., et al.. (1991). Development of regeneration following gypsy moth defoliation of Appalachian Plateau and Ridge & Valley hardwood stands. 10 indexed citations

19.

Hix, David M.. (1988). Multifactor classification and analysis of upland hardwood forest ecosystems of the Kickapoo River watershed, southwestern Wisconsin. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 18(11). 1405–1415. 31 indexed citations

20.

Hix, David M. & Burton V. Barnes. (1984). Effects of clear-cutting on the vegetation and soil of an eastern hemlock dominated ecosystem, western Upper Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 14(6). 914–923. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact