David L. Decker

34 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

David L. Decker
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 170
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 29
  • Water Science and Technology 137
  • Environmental Chemistry 89
  • Inorganic Chemistry 100
Replace Laurence Lestel with:
Laurence Lestel France
M.O. Awaleh Canada
Judith A. Perlinger United States
Gary E. Glass United States
Michael S. Milligan United States
Joakim Langner Sweden
Douglas B. Chambers United States
Dionisios Panagiotaras Greece
Laurence Hopkinson United Kingdom
Shen Zhang China
David L. Decker relative to Laurence Lestel France Laurence Lestel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Laurence Lestel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David L. Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Decker. The network helps show where David L. Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David L. Decker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David L. Decker Line = papers co-authored together David L. Decker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20226
2 20222
3 20222
4 202053
5 201724
6 201612
7 201537
8 20111
9 201124
10
The Development of an Unsaturated Flow and Reactive Transport Model for Arsenic in Carlin-Trend Heap Leach Facilities
20011
11 1998140
12 199616
13 198776
14 198416
15 19832
16
Social gerontology : an introduction to the dynamics of aging
198014
17 198032
18 198014
19 197933
20 19771

About David L. Decker

David L. Decker is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Process Chemistry and Technology, Environmental Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 35 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (5 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (3 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (3 papers), Arsenic contamination and mitigation (3 papers) and Fluoride Effects and Removal (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (170 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (29 citations), Water Science and Technology (137 citations), Environmental Chemistry (89 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (100 citations). David L. Decker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Robert M. O’Brien, David Shichor, Graham E. Fogg, Mark E. Grismer, Dianne T. Louie, D. E. Rolston, Philip P. Power, Marilyn M. Olmstead, Gary A. Sigel and James M. Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Geochemistry, Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, Criminology, Vadose Zone Journal and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026