David J. Schwartzman
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Neurology
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Anil K. SethKeisuke SuzukiDaniel BorWarrick RoseboomCornelia KrancziochNicolas RothenMatt C. GabelDaniel C. Alexander
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
David J. Schwartzman
20 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Cognitive Neuroscience 180
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
- Neurology 48
- Sensory Systems 45
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 43
Countries citing papers authored by David J. Schwartzman
This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Schwartzman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Schwartzman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Schwartzman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Schwartzman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Schwartzman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Schwartzman. The network helps show where David J. Schwartzman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Schwartzman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Schwartzman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Schwartzman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Schwartzman. David J. Schwartzman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 62 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | New Directions in EEG Measurement: an Investigation into the Fidelity of Electrical Potential Sensor Signals | 2 |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About David J. Schwartzman
David J. Schwartzman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 21 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (180 citations), Sensory Systems (45 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (67 citations). David J. Schwartzman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Anil K. Seth, Keisuke Suzuki, Daniel Bor, Warrick Roseboom, Cornelia Kranczioch, Nicolas Rothen, Matt C. Gabel, Daniel C. Alexander, Adam B. Barrett and P. Nigel Leigh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.