David J. Procter

14.3k total citations · 5 hit papers
230 papers, 12.1k citations indexed

About

David J. Procter is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Inorganic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, David J. Procter has authored 230 papers receiving a total of 12.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 203 papers in Organic Chemistry, 34 papers in Molecular Biology and 21 papers in Inorganic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in David J. Procter's work include Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (94 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (73 papers) and Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (72 papers). David J. Procter is often cited by papers focused on Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (94 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (73 papers) and Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (72 papers). David J. Procter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. David J. Procter's co-authors include Michal Szostak, Alexander P. Pulis, Malcolm Spain, Gregory J. P. Perry, Huan‐Ming Huang, Andrew J. Eberhart, David J. Edmonds, Derek Johnston, Dixit Parmar and Neal J. Fazakerley and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Chemical Society Reviews.

In The Last Decade

David J. Procter

224 papers receiving 11.9k citations

Hit Papers

Samarium(II)-Iodide-Mediated Cyclizations in Natural Prod... 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 2014 2023 2022 2023 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

David J. Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Organic Chemistry 10.8k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 1.6k
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 971
  • Materials Chemistry 440
Replace Li Deng with:
Li Deng United States
Sanzhong Luo China
Guangbin Dong United States
Ilhyong Ryu Japan
Marco Bandini Italy
Thorsten Bach Germany
Marisa C. Kozlowski United States
Hans‐Ulrich Reißig Germany
Michal Szostak United States
Koichiro Oshima Japan
Li Deng United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to David J. Procter
David J. Procter · 1×
Citations per year, relative to David J. Procter
David J. Procter · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by David J. Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Procter. The network helps show where David J. Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Procter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Procter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Procter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Procter. David J. Procter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 19
3 4
4 26
5 10
6 41
7 40
8 59
9 11
10 4
11 49
12 35
13 133
14 27
15 91
16 93
17 121
18 96
19 70
20 226

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026