David J. LaPorte

28 papers receiving 701 citations

Peers

David J. LaPorte
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Pharmacy 68
  • Biological Psychiatry 33
  • Clinical Psychology 280
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 178
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 96
Replace Mordechai Mark with:
Mordechai Mark Israel
Samuel Tyano Israel
Wade H. Berrettini United States
Kenneth R. Bruce Canada
Steve Malone United States
Barbara Mangweth Austria
Koray Karabekiroğlu Türkiye
Christopher Fairburn United Kingdom
Timothy M. Rivinus United States
Erika Hohm Germany
David J. LaPorte relative to Mordechai Mark Israel Mordechai Mark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Mordechai Mark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David J. LaPorte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. LaPorte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. LaPorte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. LaPorte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. LaPorte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. LaPorte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. LaPorte. The network helps show where David J. LaPorte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David J. LaPorte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David J. LaPorte Line = papers co-authored together David J. LaPorte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199593
2 199886
3 199672
4 198271
5 198151
6 201049
7 199238
8
Predicting attrition and adherence to a very low calorie diet: a prospective investigation of the eating inventory.
199038
9 198138
10 199730
11 201628
12 199625
13 200818
14 199617
15 199416
16 200015
17 199613
18 199712
19 201711
20 19909

About David J. LaPorte

David J. LaPorte is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Epidemiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (68 citations), Biological Psychiatry (33 citations), Clinical Psychology (280 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (178 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (96 citations). David J. LaPorte has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Armenia. Frequent co-authors include Adrienne C. Lahti, Deborah Greenberg, Carol A. Tamminga, A. Thomas McLellan, Gunvant K. Thaker, A. J. Stunkard, Arthur I. Alterman, Shawn L. Cassady, David E. Ross and Charles P. O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Addictive Behaviors, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and International Journal of Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact