David Innes Williams

414 total citations
30 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

David Innes Williams is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Small Animals and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Innes Williams has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Small Animals and 4 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in David Innes Williams's work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers). David Innes Williams is often cited by papers focused on Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers). David Innes Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. David Innes Williams's co-authors include I. Sárkány, R H Marten, Jonas Moll, Jonathan D. Walton, Thomas Casey, H. J. White and H E Lockhart-Mummery and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, The Journal of Urology and Animal Behaviour.

In The Last Decade

David Innes Williams

27 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

David Innes Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Epidemiology 95
  • Social Psychology 79
  • Cell Biology 55
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 40
  • Molecular Biology 39
Replace Georgia Lookingbill with:
Georgia Lookingbill United States
C. A. FOX United Kingdom
Dawn Sadler United Kingdom
Mark Kotur United States
Randall McNally United States
Keiko Nakano Japan
Farideh Sabri Sweden
Andrew U. Luescher United States
Simon J. Walker United Kingdom
Judyta Nowak Poland
Georgia Lookingbill United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to David Innes Williams
David Innes Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to David Innes Williams
David Innes Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by David Innes Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Innes Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Innes Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Innes Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Innes Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Innes Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Innes Williams. The network helps show where David Innes Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Innes Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Innes Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Innes Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Innes Williams. David Innes Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 6
2 3
3 1
4 1
5 3
6 1
7
The London Lock: A Charitable Hospital for Venereal Disease 1746-1952
5
8 17
9 1
10
Queen Elizabeth Hospital for Children: 125 Years of Achievement.
1
11 3
12 4
13 50
14 5
15 2
16 7
17 6
18 7
19 1
20 143

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026