This map shows the geographic impact of David Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hunter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hunter. The network helps show where David Hunter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Hunter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Hunter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Hunter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Hunter. David Hunter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hunter, David, et al.. (2019). The Paris Agreement and Global Climate Litigation after the Trump Withdrawal. eYLS (Yale Law School). 34(1). 224.3 indexed citations
Bratspies, Rebecca M., et al.. (2012). Reclaiming Global Environmental Leadership: Why the United States Should Ratify Ten Pending Environmental Treaties.1 indexed citations
4.
Hunter, David. (2011). Migratory Connectivity and the Conservation of Migratory Animals. eYLS (Yale Law School). 41(2). 317.39 indexed citations
5.
Bradlow, Daniel & David Hunter. (2010). Conclusion: The Future of International Law and International Financial Institutions. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
6.
Hunter, David. (2010). Implications of the Copenhagen Accord for Global Climate Governance. eYLS (Yale Law School). 10(2). 5.6 indexed citations
7.
Hunter, David. (2009). Lessons Learned from the European Union’s Climate Policy. eYLS (Yale Law School). 27(3). 575.1 indexed citations
8.
Hunter, David. (2009). International Climate Negotiations: Opportunities and Challenges for the Obama Administration. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum. 19(2). 247–274.1 indexed citations
9.
Hunter, David. (2008). Civil Society Networks and the Development of Environmental Standards at International Financial Institutions. Chicago journal of international law. 8(2). 5.9 indexed citations
10.
Salzman, James & David Hunter. (2007). Negligence in the Air: The Duty of Care in Climate Change Litigation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 155(6). 101–154.14 indexed citations
11.
Hunter, David, et al.. (2007). Emerging Standards for Sustainable Finance of the Energy Sector. Sustainable development law & policy. 7(3). 4.1 indexed citations
12.
Hunter, David. (2003). Using the World Bank Inspection Panel to Defend the Interests of Project-Affected People. Chicago journal of international law. 4(1). 14.16 indexed citations
13.
Hunter, David, James Salzman, & Durwood Zaelke. (2002). International environmental law and policy. eYLS (Yale Law School).93 indexed citations
Hunter, David, et al.. (1994). Concepts and principles of international environmental law : an introduction.4 indexed citations
17.
Hunter, David, et al.. (1992). Environmental Reforms in Post-Communist Central Europe: From High Hopes to Hard Reality. eYLS (Yale Law School). 13(4). 921–980.6 indexed citations
18.
Hunter, David. (1992). Toward Global Citizenship in International Environmental Law. eYLS (Yale Law School). 28(3).2 indexed citations
19.
Hunter, David. (1991). Housing practice and information technology. Longman eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.