Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis
198817.0k citationsFrank C. Arnett, Steven M. Edworthy et al.Arthritis & Rheumatismprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by David H. Neustadt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Neustadt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Neustadt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Neustadt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Neustadt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Neustadt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Neustadt. The network helps show where David H. Neustadt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David H. Neustadt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David H. Neustadt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David H. Neustadt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David H. Neustadt. David H. Neustadt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Neustadt, David H.. (2011). Whence the rheumatologist. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 64(3). 940–940.1 indexed citations
Neustadt, David H., Jacques R. Caldwell, Mary Bell, John Wade, & Joseph Gimbel. (2005). Clinical effects of intraarticular injection of high molecular weight hyaluronan (Orthovisc) in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial.. PubMed. 32(10). 1928–36.75 indexed citations
Neustadt, David H.. (2003). Long-term efficacy and safety of intra-articular sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan) in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.. PubMed. 21(3). 307–11.40 indexed citations
Neustadt, David H.. (1996). Rheumatology: The Problem Knee. Annals of Internal Medicine. 125(3). 256–256.1 indexed citations
9.
Arnett, Frank C., Steven M. Edworthy, D. Blöch, et al.. (1988). The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 31(3). 315–324.16957 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Lussier, A, et al.. (1978). Naproxen vs. aspirin in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.. PubMed. 5(3). 338–46.20 indexed citations
MacDonald, Richard A., et al.. (1962). Posterior subcapsular cataracts in non-steroid and steroid treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 5(3). 307–308.3 indexed citations
Steinbrocker, Otto & David H. Neustadt. (1954). Psychogenic rheumatism; some special diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.. PubMed. 51(12). 996–7.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.