David H. Foos

1.0k total citations
49 papers, 803 citations indexed

About

David H. Foos is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, David H. Foos has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 803 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 29 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 21 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in David H. Foos's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (29 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (27 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (19 papers). David H. Foos is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (29 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (27 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (19 papers). David H. Foos collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. David H. Foos's co-authors include Wojciech Zbijewski, J. Webster Stayman, Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen, R. Senn, J. Yorkston, Dong Yang, Nathan J. Packard, Gaurav K. Thawait, Abdullah Al Muhit and John A. Carrino and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

In The Last Decade

David H. Foos

47 papers receiving 786 citations

Peers

David H. Foos
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 520
  • Biomedical Engineering 446
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 190
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 120
  • Surgery 104
Replace Robbert W. van Hamersvelt with:
Robbert W. van Hamersvelt Netherlands
Joshy Cyriac Switzerland
Dakai Jin United States
Thierry Cresson Canada
Tobias Klinder Germany
Jang‐Hwan Choi South Korea
Nathan J. Packard United States
Xiangfei Chai China
M. Fawad Khan Germany
Grace J. Gang United States
Robbert W. van Hamersvelt Netherlands View profile →
Citations per field, relative to David H. Foos
David H. Foos · 1×
Citations per year, relative to David H. Foos
David H. Foos · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by David H. Foos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Foos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Foos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Foos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Foos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Foos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Foos. The network helps show where David H. Foos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David H. Foos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David H. Foos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David H. Foos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David H. Foos. David H. Foos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 8
3 4
4 1
5 10
6 19
7 15
8 73
9 33
10 180
11 18
12 26
13 2
14 3
15 58
16 19
17 2
18 3
19 73
20 9

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026