David H. Epstein

194 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Peers

David H. Epstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 724
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.1k
  • Applied Psychology 788
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
  • Toxicology 311
Replace Mehmet Sofuoglu with:
Mehmet Sofuoglu United States
Anna Rose Childress United States
Raymond F. Anton United States
Stephanie S. O’Malley United States
Karl Mann Germany
Rita Z. Goldstein United States
Robert M. Swift United States
Alan C. Swann United States
Lara A. Ray United States
Kent E. Hutchison United States
David H. Epstein relative to Mehmet Sofuoglu United States Mehmet Sofuoglu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mehmet Sofuoglu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David H. Epstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Epstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Epstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Epstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Epstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Epstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Epstein. The network helps show where David H. Epstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David H. Epstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David H. Epstein Line = papers co-authored together David H. Epstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 198 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006473
2 2012392
3 2011386
4 2018248
5 2009245
6 2005216
7 2016203
8 2010178
9 2002132
10 2011130
11 2005129
12 2009128
13 2020126
14 2021123
15 2000120
16 2003118
17 2003118
18 2013116
19 2006112
20 2009106

About David H. Epstein

David H. Epstein is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacology, having authored 198 papers that have together received 8.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (50 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (42 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (36 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (30 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (23 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (18 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (17 papers) and Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (724 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.1k citations), Applied Psychology (788 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations) and Toxicology (311 citations). David H. Epstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Kenzie L. Preston, Yavin Shaham, Karran A. Phillips, Lin Lü, Massoud Vahabzadeh, Jia‐Ling Lin, Udi E. Ghitza, Annie Umbricht, Jie Shi and Jane Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Psychopharmacology, Journal of Addiction Medicine, Addictive Behaviors and The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact