David Foster

632 total citations
17 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

David Foster is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, David Foster has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 4 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in David Foster's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (5 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (4 papers) and Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (3 papers). David Foster is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (5 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (4 papers) and Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (3 papers). David Foster collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. David Foster's co-authors include Mark R. Dennis, Paul J. Ackerman, Jung‐Shen B. Tai, Ivan I. Smalyukh, Daniel Weigand, Paul Sutcliffe, Peter Bowcock, N. S. Manton, Hridesh Kedia and William T. M. Irvine and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Nature Physics.

In The Last Decade

David Foster

16 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

David Foster
M. Steinberg United States
Michael Ray United States
H. B. G. Casimir Netherlands
David W. Ward United States
Rainer Dumke Singapore
M. Steinberg United States
David Foster
Citations per year, relative to David Foster David Foster (= 1×) peers M. Steinberg

Countries citing papers authored by David Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Foster. The network helps show where David Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Foster. David Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Foster, David, et al.. (2021). Magnetic skyrmion binning. Physical review. B.. 103(10). 21 indexed citations
2.
Foster, David, et al.. (2019). Two-dimensional skyrmion bags in liquid crystals and ferromagnets. Nature Physics. 15(7). 655–659. 176 indexed citations
3.
Adam, C., et al.. (2018). BPS sectors of the Skyrme model and their non-BPS extensions. Physical review. D. 97(3). 7 indexed citations
4.
Dennis, Mark R., et al.. (2017). Knotted fields and explicit fibrations for lemniscate knots. Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 473(2202). 20160829–20160829. 28 indexed citations
5.
Foster, David. (2017). The decay of Hopf solitons in the Skyrme model. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical. 50(40). 405401–405401. 4 indexed citations
6.
Kedia, Hridesh, David Foster, Mark R. Dennis, & William T. M. Irvine. (2016). Weaving Knotted Vector Fields with Tunable Helicity. Physical Review Letters. 117(27). 274501–274501. 33 indexed citations
7.
Foster, David & N. S. Manton. (2015). Scattering of nucleons in the classical Skyrme model. Nuclear Physics B. 899. 513–526. 18 indexed citations
8.
Foster, David, et al.. (2015). Scattering of Skyrmions. Nuclear Physics B. 897. 697–716. 15 indexed citations
9.
Foster, David. (2012). Static Hopfions in the extended Skyrme-Faddeev model. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2012(12). 2 indexed citations
10.
Foster, David & Andrew Harrison. (2011). Experimental investigation of a 5-DOF robot arm with sliding mode control. 40. 125–130. 1 indexed citations
11.
Foster, David. (2011). Massive hopfions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 83(8). 19 indexed citations
12.
Foster, David. (2010). The Hillsborough Agreement.
13.
Bowcock, Peter, David Foster, & Paul Sutcliffe. (2009). Q-balls, integrability and duality. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical. 42(8). 85403–85403. 39 indexed citations
14.
Foster, David & Paul Sutcliffe. (2009). Baby Skyrmions stabilized by vector mesons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 79(12). 12 indexed citations
15.
Foster, David & Daniel Weigand. (2008). The role of cognitive and metacognitive development in mental skills training. Sport & Exercise Psychology Review. 4(1). 21–29. 5 indexed citations
16.
Foster, David, et al.. (2006). The Effect of Removing Superstitious Behavior and Introducing a Pre-Performance Routine on Basketball Free-Throw Performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 18(2). 167–171. 65 indexed citations
17.
Foster, David. (1973). A new sum rule for the kinetic theory of classical fluids. Physics Letters A. 46(1). 9–10. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026