David Field
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
- Pharmacy top 10%
- Co-authors
- I E HopkinAnthony MilnerN A TaubBradley N ManktelowElizabeth S. DraperDavid AtkinsonArthur F. HolmesOliver O’Donovan
- Topics
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (8 papers)Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetArchives of Disease in ChildhoodArchives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Field
24 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 121
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 108
- Sociology and Political Science 42
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 34
- Pharmacy 34
Countries citing papers authored by David Field
This map shows the geographic impact of David Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Field. The network helps show where David Field may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Field
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Field. David Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Trends in the incidence and survival of births at 22 to 26 weeks in England: A population based study | 2 |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Undertaking bereavement research : sensitivities and sensibilities. | 11 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | New Dictionary of Christian Ethics and Pastoral Theology | 24 |
| 18 | New Dictionary of Christian Ethics & Pastoral Theology | 10 |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About David Field
David Field is a scholar working on Religious studies, History and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (8 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (34 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (108 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (34 citations). David Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include I E Hopkin, Anthony Milner, N A Taub, Bradley N Manktelow, Elizabeth S. Draper, David Atkinson, Arthur F. Holmes, Oliver O’Donovan, Christopher R. Field and Sheila Payne. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Archives of Disease in Childhood and Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.