David F. Good

32 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

David F. Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Economics and Econometrics 163
  • Political Science and International Relations 143
  • Sociology and Political Science 140
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 51
  • Finance 46
Replace B. R. Tomlinson with:
B. R. Tomlinson United Kingdom
György Ránki Hungary
Mark Spoerer Germany
Jacob Metzer Israel
Herman Van der Wee Belgium
P. G. M. Dickson United States
Everett Ferguson United States
Maurice Lévy–Leboyer France
Alastair McAuley United Kingdom
Selwyn Cornish Australia
David F. Good relative to B. R. Tomlinson United Kingdom B. R. Tomlinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
B. R. Tomlinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David F. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David F. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David F. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David F. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David F. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David F. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David F. Good. The network helps show where David F. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David F. Good

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David F. Good. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David F. Good based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David F. Good. David F. Good is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Proxy Data and Income Estimates
0
2
Developing female entrepreneurial capital for technology entrepreneurship: the case of MEETS
3
3 2
4
From World War to Waldheim.
2
5 26
6 5
7
Frauen in Österreich : Beiträge zu ihrer Situation im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert
0
8
Economic Transformations in East and Central Europe: Legacies from the Past and Policies for the Future
5
9 2
10 8
11
"The Economic Lag of Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from the Late Nineteenth-Century Habsburg Empire"
4
12
Economic Transformation in Central Europe: The View from History
0
13 0
14
Der wirtschaftliche Aufstieg des Habsburgerreiches, 1750-1914
7
15 7
16 1
17 0
18 2
19 1
20 1

About David F. Good

David F. Good is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Finance, having authored 40 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (5 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers) and Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (143 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (51 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (163 citations). David F. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include György Ránki, Amy Thompson McCandless, Richard L. Rudolph, Charles P. Kindleberger, Tao Ma, Monika Streissler, Erich Streißler, Carl Menger, Alan S. Milward and Robert Legvold. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Planta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026