David Edgell

13 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

David Edgell
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 55
  • Emergency Medicine 96
  • Internal Medicine 31
  • Surgery 218
  • Biochemistry 29
Replace Jorge Ojito with:
Jorge Ojito United States
Concetta Carlucci Italy
Vincent Olshove United States
Alan J. Spotnitz United States
Robert Lancey United States
Philippe Gaudard France
Laurent Höhn Switzerland
Marion Wiegele Austria
Annalisa Franco Italy
Poonam Malhotra Kapoor India
David Edgell relative to Jorge Ojito United States Jorge Ojito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jorge Ojito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Edgell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Edgell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Edgell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Edgell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Edgell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Edgell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Edgell. The network helps show where David Edgell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Edgell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Edgell Line = papers co-authored together David Edgell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200866
2 200664
3 199249
4
Does the addition of albumin to the prime solution in cardiopulmonary bypass affect clinical outcome? A prospective randomized study.
198942
5 198938
6 200437
7 199934
8 198731
9 200730
10 200012
11 20009
12 20096
13 20045

About David Edgell

David Edgell is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (3 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (55 citations), Emergency Medicine (96 citations), Internal Medicine (31 citations), Surgery (218 citations) and Biochemistry (29 citations). David Edgell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Marelli, Peter Angood, Gabrielle deVeber, R. C.-J. Chiu, A. Paul, Brian W. McCrindle, M L Brigden, Michelle McPherson, Gordon Hoag and Desmond Bohn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Anesthesia & Analgesia, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Chemistry and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact