David E. Yarborough

993 total citations
62 papers, 753 citations indexed

About

David E. Yarborough is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, David E. Yarborough has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 753 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 60 papers in Plant Science, 9 papers in Cell Biology and 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in David E. Yarborough's work include Berry genetics and cultivation research (54 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (17 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (15 papers). David E. Yarborough is often cited by papers focused on Berry genetics and cultivation research (54 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (17 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (15 papers). David E. Yarborough collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. David E. Yarborough's co-authors include Bernadine C. Strik, K. I. N. Jensen, John M. Smagula, Seanna L. Annis, Prasanta Bhowmik, F. A. Drummond, F. A. Drummond, G. C. Starr, Michele C. Marra and James F. Hunt and has published in prestigious journals such as Weed Science, HortScience and Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

In The Last Decade

David E. Yarborough

57 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David E. Yarborough United States 15 629 212 154 76 54 62 753
K. Phelps United Kingdom 18 835 1.3× 141 0.7× 122 0.8× 118 1.6× 63 1.2× 38 978
Thomas E. O’Dell United States 13 510 0.8× 294 1.4× 216 1.4× 212 2.8× 34 0.6× 16 672
B. Heijne Netherlands 16 582 0.9× 266 1.3× 81 0.5× 252 3.3× 29 0.5× 52 710
Stephen O. Guy United States 17 571 0.9× 69 0.3× 112 0.7× 29 0.4× 41 0.8× 49 773
J. Jeffrey Mullahey United States 15 314 0.5× 158 0.7× 166 1.1× 18 0.2× 72 1.3× 34 567
B. D. Thomson Australia 18 1.0k 1.6× 126 0.6× 114 0.7× 65 0.9× 18 0.3× 23 1.1k
L. H. Rhodes United States 14 692 1.1× 71 0.3× 73 0.5× 101 1.3× 33 0.6× 34 797
P. C. Quimby United States 18 760 1.2× 145 0.7× 427 2.8× 234 3.1× 47 0.9× 51 1.0k
D. R. Tottman Italy 7 891 1.4× 69 0.3× 143 0.9× 64 0.8× 47 0.9× 10 1.0k
A. E. MacGuidwin United States 18 728 1.2× 49 0.2× 133 0.9× 88 1.2× 45 0.8× 55 898

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Yarborough

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Yarborough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Yarborough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Yarborough more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Yarborough

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Yarborough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Yarborough. The network helps show where David E. Yarborough may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David E. Yarborough

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David E. Yarborough. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David E. Yarborough based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David E. Yarborough. David E. Yarborough is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yarborough, David E.. (2023). The wild blueberry industry in North America. Acta Horticulturae. 329–334.
2.
Yarborough, David E.. (2023). Effect of hexazinone on species distributions and weed competition in lowbush blueberry fields in Maine.. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst).
3.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (2014). Evaluating field inputs for productivity and profitability in wild blueberry fields in Maine. Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University). 2 indexed citations
4.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (2014). Pre- and post-emergence applications of herbicides for control of resistant fineleaf sheep fescue in wild blueberry fields in Maine. Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University). 11 indexed citations
5.
Drummond, F. A. & David E. Yarborough. (2014). GROWING SEASON EFFECTS ON WILD BLUEBERRY (VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM) IN MAINE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT. Acta Horticulturae. 101–107. 9 indexed citations
6.
Drummond, F. A., John M. Smagula, David E. Yarborough, & Seanna L. Annis. (2012). Organic Lowbush Blueberry Research and Extension in Maine. International Journal of Fruit Science. 12(1-3). 216–231. 8 indexed citations
7.
Annis, Seanna L., et al.. (2012). Efficacy of Organically Acceptable Materials for Control of Mummy Berry Disease on Lowbush Blueberries in Maine. International Journal of Fruit Science. 12(1-3). 188–204. 6 indexed citations
8.
Yarborough, David E.. (2009). Cultivated lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) establishment and management.. Jilin Nongye Daxue xuebao. 31(5). 556–560. 1 indexed citations
9.
Drummond, F. A., John M. Smagula, Seanna L. Annis, & David E. Yarborough. (2009). Organic wild blueberry production.. 25 indexed citations
10.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (2008). MP759: Grower Survey of Organic Pest Management Practices for Wild Blueberries in Maine with Case Studies. Rejuvenation Research. 759(6). 749–54. 3 indexed citations
11.
Strik, Bernadine C. & David E. Yarborough. (2005). Blueberry Production Trends in North America, 1992 to 2003, and Predictions for Growth. HortTechnology. 15(2). 391–398. 97 indexed citations
12.
Dalton, Timothy J., et al.. (2002). TB183: Investment, Ownership and Operating Costs of Supplemental Irrigation Systems for Maine Wild Blueberries. DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University). 183. 4 indexed citations
13.
DeMoranville, Carolyn J, et al.. (2000). Chemical Characteristics of Water Used for Cranberry Production. HortTechnology. 10(3). 603–607. 2 indexed citations
14.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (1991). Natural Variability in Yield of Lowbush Blueberries. HortScience. 26(3). 245–246. 51 indexed citations
15.
Smagula, John M. & David E. Yarborough. (1990). Changes in the lowbush blueberry industry.. Fruit varieties journal. 44(2). 72–77. 8 indexed citations
16.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (1985). An Economic Evaluation of Hexazinone Use for Weed Control in Lowbush Blueberry Production. HortScience. 20(3). 404–405. 2 indexed citations
17.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (1985). Hexazinone on Weeds and on Lowbush Blueberry Growth and Yield. HortScience. 20(3). 406–407. 10 indexed citations
18.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (1981). The influence of summer pruning on photosynthesis, transpiration, leaf abscission, and dry weight accumulation of young apple trees. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 106(3). 393–396. 15 indexed citations
19.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (1981). A Comparison between Flail Mowing and Burning for Pruning Lowbush Blueberries1. HortScience. 16(3). 318–319. 5 indexed citations
20.
Yarborough, David E., et al.. (1981). Lambkill Control in Lowbush Blueberry Fields with Glyphosate and 2, 4-D1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 106(3). 393–396. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026