David E. Potter

130 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

David E. Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 434
  • Ophthalmology 774
  • Family Practice 135
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 506
  • Physiology 464
Replace Wendy A. Davis with:
Wendy A. Davis Australia
C. T. Dollery United Kingdom
William E. Wilkinson United States
Hans Persson Sweden
Elizabeth R. Seaquist United States
Edoardo Spina Italy
Martin Wehling Germany
Yola Moride Canada
Michaëla Diamant Netherlands
Philip Raskin United States
David E. Potter relative to Wendy A. Davis Australia Wendy A. Davis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.9×
Wendy A. Davis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Potter. The network helps show where David E. Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Potter Line = papers co-authored together David E. Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005356
2
The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource.
1997297
3 1981133
4 1971129
5 2004119
6 1978110
7 198686
8 197872
9 198156
10 197856
11 196553
12 200953
13 199050
14 200750
15 200542
16 198241
17 201238
18 198636
19 199736
20 201435

About David E. Potter

David E. Potter is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Biochemistry and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 131 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (41 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (31 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (23 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (19 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (14 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (11 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (10 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (434 citations), Ophthalmology (774 citations), Family Practice (135 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (506 citations) and Physiology (464 citations). David E. Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include James A. Burke, J. Mark Rowland, Alan Lyles, Denys T. Lau, Judith D. Kasper, Richard G. Bennett, Teh‐Ching Chu, R. J. Reiter, Craig E. Crosson and Steven B. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Current Eye Research, Pharmacology, Experimental Eye Research and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026