Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories
2009535 citationsDavid DodmanEnvironment and Urbanizationprofile →
Six research priorities for cities and climate change
2018439 citationsXuemei Bai, Richard Dawson et al.Natureprofile →
Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research
2016389 citationsEric Chu, David Dodman et al.profile →
Building Resilience to Climate Change in Informal Settlements
2020249 citationsDavid Satterthwaite, Diane Archer et al.profile →
This map shows the geographic impact of David Dodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Dodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Dodman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Dodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Dodman. The network helps show where David Dodman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Dodman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Dodman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Dodman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Dodman. David Dodman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Diep, Loan, David Dodman, & Priti Parikh. (2019). Green Infrastructure in Informal Settlements through a Multiple Level Perspective. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.24 indexed citations
3.
Bai, Xuemei, Richard Dawson, Diána Ürge-Vorsatz, et al.. (2018). Six research priorities for cities and climate change. Nature. 555(7694). 23–25.439 indexed citations breakdown →
Dodman, David, Gordon McGranahan, & Barry Dalal-Clayton. (2013). Integrating the environment in urban planning and management: key principles and approaches for cities in the 21st century.32 indexed citations
11.
Dodman, David, et al.. (2012). Understanding the nature and scale of urban risk in low- and middle-income countries and its implications for humanitarian preparedness, planning and response.. UCL Discovery (University College London).30 indexed citations
Parry, Martin L., Nigel W. Arnell, Pam Berry, et al.. (2009). Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates. CentAUR (University of Reading).178 indexed citations
Dodman, David. (2009). Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environment and Urbanization. 21(1). 185–201.535 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Arnell, Nigel W., M. L. Parry, Peter Berry, et al.. (2009). Costs of adaptation in the water sector.. 40–50.4 indexed citations
18.
Dodman, David. (2009). emissions inventories Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas.2 indexed citations
19.
Wheeler, Terry A., Richard Tiffin, Martin L. Parry, et al.. (2009). Costs of adaptation in agriculture, forestry and fisheries.. 29–39.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.