Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
On implementing 2D rectangular assignment algorithms
2016200 citationsDavid CrouseIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of David Crouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Crouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Crouse more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Crouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Crouse. The network helps show where David Crouse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Crouse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Crouse.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Crouse based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Crouse. David Crouse is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Crouse, David. (2016). Bearings-only localization using direction cosines. International Conference on Information Fusion. 304–311.2 indexed citations
7.
Crouse, David. (2016). On implementing 2D rectangular assignment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems. 52(4). 1679–1696.200 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Crouse, David. (2015). Cubature/unscented/sigma point Kalman filtering with angular measurement models. International Conference on Information Fusion. 1550–1557.11 indexed citations
Crouse, David, Richard W. Osborne, Krishna R. Pattipati, Peter Willett, & Yaakov Bar‐Shalom. (2013). Efficient 2D Sensor Location Estimation using Targets of Opportunity.. 8. 73–89.5 indexed citations
Crouse, David, Peter Willett, Krishna R. Pattipati, & Lennart Svensson. (2011). A look at Gaussian mixture reduction algorithms. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 1–8.42 indexed citations
15.
Crouse, David, et al.. (2011). The Set MHT. International Conference on Information Fusion. 1–8.1 indexed citations
16.
Crouse, David, et al.. (2011). The Set IMMJPDA filter for multitarget tracking. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8050. 80500O–80500O.1 indexed citations
17.
Crouse, David, et al.. (2009). A look at the PMHT. International Conference on Information Fusion. 332–339.11 indexed citations
18.
Crouse, David, Marco Guerriero, & Peter Willett. (2009). A Critical Look at the PMHT.. 4. 93–116.22 indexed citations
Crouse, David. (2007). Remark on algorithm 515. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 33(2). 15–15.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.