David Clinton

2.1k total citations
71 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

David Clinton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, David Clinton has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Clinical Psychology, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in David Clinton's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (51 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (33 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (15 papers). David Clinton is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (51 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (33 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (15 papers). David Clinton collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. David Clinton's co-authors include Claes Norring, Andreas Birgegård, Caroline Björck, Staffan Sohlberg, Elin Monell, Rolf Sandell, Lauri Nevonen, Emma Forsén Mantilla, Thomas Nilsson and Carl‐Otto Jonsson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychological Medicine and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

In The Last Decade

David Clinton

70 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Clinton Sweden 24 1.3k 280 242 221 217 71 1.6k
Cynthia L. S. Pury United States 18 663 0.5× 189 0.7× 628 2.6× 70 0.3× 62 0.3× 42 1.4k
Chris Piotrowski United States 23 769 0.6× 120 0.4× 404 1.7× 118 0.5× 54 0.2× 93 1.5k
Vicky Rippere United Kingdom 18 479 0.4× 129 0.5× 316 1.3× 150 0.7× 47 0.2× 66 1.2k
Kausar Suhail Pakistan 15 359 0.3× 209 0.7× 304 1.3× 175 0.8× 55 0.3× 24 853
Hyoun S. Kim Canada 21 1.2k 0.9× 396 1.4× 153 0.6× 100 0.5× 44 0.2× 123 1.6k
Tony Towell United Kingdom 16 446 0.3× 264 0.9× 205 0.8× 77 0.3× 76 0.4× 30 1.1k
Timothy Baghurst United States 14 334 0.3× 159 0.6× 208 0.9× 47 0.2× 74 0.3× 90 981
C. Merle Johnson United States 18 199 0.1× 53 0.2× 116 0.5× 183 0.8× 29 0.1× 63 1.0k
Laura Castro‐Schilo United States 13 387 0.3× 175 0.6× 272 1.1× 49 0.2× 85 0.4× 24 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by David Clinton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Clinton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Clinton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Clinton. The network helps show where David Clinton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Clinton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Clinton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Clinton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Clinton. David Clinton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bul, Kim, et al.. (2025). The journey of playing: a qualitative evaluation of ‘Maze Out,’ a serious game for eating disorders. Journal of Eating Disorders. 13(1). 154–154. 1 indexed citations
4.
Birgegård, Andreas, Afrouz Abbaspour, Stina Borg, et al.. (2021). Longitudinal experiences and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among people with past or current eating disorders in Sweden. Eating Disorders. 30(6). 602–617. 9 indexed citations
5.
Birgegård, Andreas, Lars Brudin, Emma Forsén Mantilla, et al.. (2021). Initial self-blame predicts eating disorder remission after 9 years. Journal of Eating Disorders. 9(1). 81–81. 5 indexed citations
6.
Monell, Elin, et al.. (2020). Binge Eating and Addictive-Like Behaviours in Males and Females. Psychological Reports. 125(1). 148–166. 12 indexed citations
7.
Monell, Elin, David Clinton, & Andreas Birgegård. (2020). Self-directed behaviors differentially explain associations between emotion dysregulation and eating disorder psychopathology in patients with or without objective binge-eating. Journal of Eating Disorders. 8(1). 17–17. 8 indexed citations
8.
Clinton, David, et al.. (2019). Personality as predictor of outcome in internet-based treatment of bulimic eating disorders. Eating Behaviors. 36. 101360–101360. 6 indexed citations
9.
Zandian, Modjtaba, et al.. (2016). Eating disorder symptoms pre- and postpartum. Archives of Women s Mental Health. 19(4). 675–680. 43 indexed citations
10.
Clinton, David, et al.. (2013). Clinical characteristics and distinctiveness of DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses: findings from a large naturalistic clinical database. Journal of Eating Disorders. 1(1). 31–31. 43 indexed citations
11.
Hansson, Lena M., Caroline Björck, Andreas Birgegård, & David Clinton. (2011). How do eating disorder patients eat after treatment? Dietary habits and eating behaviour three years after entering treatment. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity. 16(1). 1–8. 11 indexed citations
12.
Birgegård, Andreas, Claes Norring, & David Clinton. (2011). DSM‐IV versus DSM‐5: Implementation of proposed DSM‐5 criteria in a large naturalistic database. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 45(3). 353–361. 55 indexed citations
13.
Clinton, David, et al.. (2010). The impact of different outcome measures on estimates of remission in a 3‐year follow‐up of eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review. 19(1). 2–11. 26 indexed citations
14.
Nilsson, Thomas, et al.. (2007). Patients’ experiences of change in cognitive–behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy: a qualitative comparative study. Psychotherapy Research. 17(5). 553–566. 103 indexed citations
15.
Björck, Caroline, et al.. (2007). Self‐image and treatment drop‐out in eating disorders. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 81(1). 95–104. 20 indexed citations
16.
Nevonen, Lauri, David Clinton, & Claes Norring. (2006). Validating the EDI-2 in three Swedish female samples: Eating disorders patients, psychiatric outpatients and normal controls. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 60(1). 44–50. 72 indexed citations
17.
Bragesjö, Maria, David Clinton, & Rolf Sandell. (2004). The credibility of psychodynamic, cognitive and cognitive‐behavioural psychotherapy in a randomly selected sample of the general public. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 77(3). 297–307. 14 indexed citations
18.
Björck, Caroline, David Clinton, Staffan Sohlberg, Tore Hällström, & Claes Norring. (2003). Interpersonal profiles in eating disorders: Ratings of SASB self‐image. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 76(4). 337–349. 45 indexed citations
19.
Nevonen, Lauri, Anders Broberg, David Clinton, & Claes Norring. (2003). A measure for the assessment of eating disorders: Reliability and validity studies of the Rating of Anorexia and Bulimia interview – revised version (RAB‐R). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 44(4). 303–310. 35 indexed citations
20.
Clinton, David. (2001). Expectations and Experiences of Treatment in Eating Disorders. Eating Disorders. 9(4). 361–371. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026