William F. Porter

3.1k total citations
100 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

William F. Porter is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, William F. Porter has authored 100 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Ecology, 30 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 19 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in William F. Porter's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (53 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (26 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers). William F. Porter is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (53 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (26 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers). William F. Porter collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. William F. Porter's co-authors include Benjamin Zuckerberg, H. Brian Underwood, Nancy E. Mathews, David Williams, Michale J. Glennon, Steven Roberts, Kevin E. M. Church, Brent A. Rudolph, Richard W. Sage and Jocelyn L. Aycrigg and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Global Change Biology.

In The Last Decade

William F. Porter

98 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William F. Porter United States 28 1.9k 638 489 412 304 100 2.4k
Miguel Delibes‐Mateos Spain 29 2.2k 1.2× 571 0.9× 392 0.8× 340 0.8× 264 0.9× 115 2.9k
David L. Otis United States 20 2.7k 1.4× 815 1.3× 410 0.8× 436 1.1× 373 1.2× 55 3.3k
Clayton K. Nielsen United States 30 2.7k 1.4× 489 0.8× 528 1.1× 378 0.9× 243 0.8× 159 3.2k
Reginald H. Barrett United States 29 1.7k 0.9× 611 1.0× 375 0.8× 447 1.1× 241 0.8× 58 2.2k
Nova J. Silvy United States 30 2.4k 1.3× 492 0.8× 365 0.7× 359 0.9× 425 1.4× 197 3.2k
Scott R. Winterstein United States 23 1.9k 1.0× 597 0.9× 187 0.4× 354 0.9× 279 0.9× 55 2.5k
Anne Gunn Canada 28 1.9k 1.0× 324 0.5× 362 0.7× 239 0.6× 296 1.0× 97 2.8k
Michael R. Conover United States 28 2.3k 1.2× 511 0.8× 190 0.4× 608 1.5× 331 1.1× 115 2.8k
Kátia Maria Paschoaletto Micchi de Barros Ferraz Brazil 28 1.7k 0.9× 665 1.0× 577 1.2× 437 1.1× 375 1.2× 96 2.4k
Christopher S. DePerno United States 24 1.8k 0.9× 427 0.7× 212 0.4× 520 1.3× 317 1.0× 152 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by William F. Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Porter. The network helps show where William F. Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Porter. William F. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Ruder, Mark G., et al.. (2020). The role of drought as a determinant of hemorrhagic disease in the eastern United States. Global Change Biology. 26(7). 3799–3808. 14 indexed citations
3.
Stevens, Bryan S., et al.. (2020). Spatial-temporal dynamics of hunter effort for wild turkeys in Michigan. PLoS ONE. 15(4). e0230747–e0230747. 3 indexed citations
4.
Snow, Nathan P., Zhen Zhang, Andrew O. Finley, et al.. (2018). Regional‐based mitigation to reduce wildlife–vehicle collisions. Journal of Wildlife Management. 82(4). 756–765. 10 indexed citations
5.
Jarzyna, Marta A., Benjamin Zuckerberg, Andrew O. Finley, & William F. Porter. (2016). Synergistic effects of climate and land cover: grassland birds are more vulnerable to climate change. Landscape Ecology. 31(10). 2275–2290. 45 indexed citations
6.
Guber, Andrey, et al.. (2016). Model of pathogen transmission between livestock and white-tailed deer in fragmented agricultural and forest landscapes. Environmental Modelling & Software. 80. 185–200. 7 indexed citations
7.
Jarzyna, Marta A., William F. Porter, Brian A. Maurer, Benjamin Zuckerberg, & Andrew O. Finley. (2015). Landscape fragmentation affects responses of avian communities to climate change. Global Change Biology. 21(8). 2942–2953. 37 indexed citations
8.
Snow, Nathan P., William F. Porter, & David Williams. (2014). Underreporting of wildlife-vehicle collisions does not hinder predictive models for large ungulates. Biological Conservation. 181. 44–53. 40 indexed citations
9.
Schoch, Nina, et al.. (2014). The Effects of Lakeshore Development on Common Loon (Gavia immer) Productivity in the Adirondack Park, New York, USA. Waterbirds. 37(sp1). 94–101. 6 indexed citations
10.
Zuckerberg, Benjamin, et al.. (2013). Applying occupancy estimation and modelling to the analysis of atlas data. Diversity and Distributions. 19(7). 804–814. 23 indexed citations
11.
Williams, David, et al.. (2012). Impact of Habitat-Specific GPS Positional Error on Detection of Movement Scales by First-Passage Time Analysis. PLoS ONE. 7(11). e48439–e48439. 16 indexed citations
12.
Ma, Zhihai, Benjamin Zuckerberg, William F. Porter, & Lianjun Zhang. (2012). Spatial Poisson Models for Examining the Influence of Climate and Land Cover Pattern on Bird Species Richness. Forest Science. 58(1). 61–74. 16 indexed citations
13.
14.
Glennon, Michale J. & William F. Porter. (2007). Impacts of Land-use Management on Small Mammals in the Adirondack Park, New York. Northeastern Naturalist. 14(3). 323–342. 19 indexed citations
15.
Sage, Richard W., William F. Porter, & H. Brian Underwood. (2003). Windows of opportunity: white-tailed deer and the dynamics of northern hardwood forests of the northeastern US. Journal for Nature Conservation. 10(4). 213–220. 57 indexed citations
16.
Porter, William F., et al.. (2000). Using Satellite Imagery to Assess Large-Scale Habitat Characteristics of Adirondack Park, New York, USA. Environmental Management. 26(5). 553–561. 15 indexed citations
17.
Porter, William F., et al.. (1995). INFLUENCES OF WEATHER AND LAND USE ON WILD TURKEY POPULATIONS IN NEW YORK. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1995(S1). 75–80. 3 indexed citations
18.
Underwood, H. Brian & William F. Porter. (1991). Values and Science: White-tailed Deer Management in Eastern National Parks. 56. 67–73. 9 indexed citations
19.
Porter, William F., et al.. (1990). APPLICATION OF POPULATION MODELING TECHNIQUES TO WILD TURKEY MANAGEMENT. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1990(S1). 107–118. 1 indexed citations
20.
Mathews, Nancy E. & William F. Porter. (1988). Black bear predation of white-tailed deer neonates in the central Adirondacks. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 66(5). 1241–1242. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026