David C. Latimer

471 citations
33 papers · 340 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

David C. Latimer

31 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

David C. Latimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 188
  • Ceramics and Composites 36
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 81
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 36
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 46
Replace R. Timmerman with:
R. Timmerman Netherlands
Guillaume Attuel France
Ding Li China
A. Chao United States
Shoichi Ohi Japan
J. Chiba Japan
Taishi Watanabe Japan
D. Walsh United Kingdom
Yongseok Lee South Korea
Evan Jones United Kingdom
David C. Latimer relative to R. Timmerman Netherlands R. Timmerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
R. Timmerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Latimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Latimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Latimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Latimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Latimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Latimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Latimer. The network helps show where David C. Latimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside David C. Latimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David C. Latimer Line = papers co-authored together David C. Latimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198852
2 200047
3 199832
4 200331
5 201325
6 201821
7 200915
8 199913
9 200312
10 201012
11 201712
12 20059
13 20059
14 20167
15 20107
16 20055
17
Quantizing the damped harmonic oscillator
20044
18 20074
19 19973
20 20073

About David C. Latimer

David C. Latimer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (17 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (16 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (5 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (188 citations), Ceramics and Composites (36 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (81 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (36 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (46 citations). David C. Latimer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Keith Hannabuss, Bradley J. Roth, D. J. Ernst, I. Dutta, David L. Bourell, Susan Gardner, Kevin Kit Parker, Abhijit Samanta, Ricardo Alarcón and C. Djalali. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Journal of Composite Materials, Advances in High Energy Physics and Physical Review A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact