David C. Cooper

11 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

David C. Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Sensory Systems 43
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 20
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 31
  • Environmental Chemistry 32
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 43
Replace Pınar Ömür-Özbek with:
Pınar Ömür-Özbek United States
Lars Moseholm Denmark
Qi Shang China
Mark Higuchi United States
Dong An China
Sonya R Murray Australia
Gianna Serafina Monti Italy
Yoshitaka Imaizumi Japan
Mariana Nascimento Machado Brazil
Cornelius Kendall Wilkins Denmark
David C. Cooper relative to Pınar Ömür-Özbek United States Pınar Ömür-Özbek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Pınar Ömür-Özbek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Cooper. The network helps show where David C. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside David C. Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David C. Cooper Line = papers co-authored together David C. Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 197361
2 201561
3 199456
4 199256
5 196734
6 197321
7 200917
8 19965
9 20114
10 19953
11
Review: Hao Wang, Proving Theorems by Pattern Recognition I
19671
12 19931

About David C. Cooper

David C. Cooper is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Pollution, having authored 12 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1 paper), Industrial Gas Emission Control (1 paper), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (1 paper), Marine and fisheries research (1 paper), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1 paper), Berry genetics and cultivation research (1 paper), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Marine and coastal ecosystems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (43 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (20 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (31 citations), Environmental Chemistry (32 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (43 citations). David C. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cyprus and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Debra R. Reinhart, B. Jack Copeland, Larry A. Gatlin, Susan S. Schiffman, William C. Stagner, James M. Way, Andrew Young, Ali Tavakkoli, Wendy White and Lihong Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Ecological Monographs, PLoS ONE and Neurobiology of Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact