David C. Bell
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- Linda BellAlan J. RichardJohn S. AtkinsonIsaac D. MontoyaAlan W. LeschiedWilliam N. ElwoodMark L. WilliamsRobin Nelson
- Topics
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (17 papers)HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (17 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
David C. Bell
81 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Sociology and Political Science 455
- Social Psychology 396
- Epidemiology 376
- Clinical Psychology 371
- General Health Professions 345
Countries citing papers authored by David C. Bell
This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Bell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Bell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Bell. The network helps show where David C. Bell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David C. Bell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David C. Bell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David C. Bell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David C. Bell. David C. Bell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | Pre-service teachers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding school-based bullying | 71 |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 98 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Motivations for condom use and nonuse. | 11 |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 55 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About David C. Bell
David C. Bell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and General Health Professions, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (17 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (17 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (396 citations), Clinical Psychology (371 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (23 citations). David C. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Linda Bell, Alan J. Richard, John S. Atkinson, Isaac D. Montoya, Alan W. Leschied, William N. Elwood, Linda Bell, Mark L. Williams, Robin Nelson and Richard T. Spence. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Health Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.