David Brieber

819 total citations
10 papers, 554 citations indexed

About

David Brieber is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Brieber has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 554 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in David Brieber's work include Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers). David Brieber is often cited by papers focused on Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers). David Brieber collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. David Brieber's co-authors include Helmut Leder, Marcos Nadal, Raphaël Rosenberg, Norbert Schwarz, Gernot Gerger, Pablo P. L. Tinio, Thomas Jacobsen, Eva Specker, Matthew Pelowski and Michael Forster and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cognition & Emotion and Acta Psychologica.

In The Last Decade

David Brieber

9 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David Brieber Austria	8	446	254	219	142	91	10	554
Raphaël Rosenberg Austria	13	508 1.1×	307 1.2×	242 1.1×	156 1.1×	73 0.8×	36	666
Michael Forster Austria	13	692 1.6×	450 1.8×	289 1.3×	186 1.3×	116 1.3×	24	837
G. Gabrielle Starr United States	11	583 1.3×	390 1.5×	234 1.1×	216 1.5×	49 0.5×	27	739
Eva Specker Austria	15	448 1.0×	240 0.9×	226 1.0×	129 0.9×	91 1.0×	36	703
Patrick S. Markey Austria	8	462 1.0×	268 1.1×	162 0.7×	100 0.7×	97 1.1×	11	525
Gernot Gerger Austria	15	885 2.0×	582 2.3×	392 1.8×	245 1.7×	185 2.0×	28	1.1k
Claudia Muth Germany	9	386 0.9×	281 1.1×	161 0.7×	95 0.7×	65 0.7×	17	462
Alison F. Eardley United Kingdom	14	383 0.9×	185 0.7×	78 0.4×	38 0.3×	19 0.2×	31	622
Gisèle Marty Spain	8	474 1.1×	336 1.3×	235 1.1×	141 1.0×	35 0.4×	20	587
Jonathan Sammartino United States	5	347 0.8×	252 1.0×	328 1.5×	124 0.9×	36 0.4×	6	540

Countries citing papers authored by David Brieber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Brieber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Brieber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Brieber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Brieber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Brieber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Brieber. The network helps show where David Brieber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Brieber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Brieber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Brieber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Brieber. David Brieber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Pelowski, Matthew, et al.. (2022). The Vienna Art Picture System (VAPS): A data set of 999 paintings and subjective ratings for art and aesthetics research.. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 17(5). 660–671. 20 indexed citations

Brieber, David, et al.. (2021). Protocol for the conceptualization and evaluation of a screening-tool for fitness-to-drive assessment in older people with cognitive impairment. PLoS ONE. 16(9). e0256262–e0256262. 1 indexed citations

Leder, Helmut, et al.. (2018). Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 37(1). 104–114. 73 indexed citations

Brieber, David, Michael Forster, & Helmut Leder. (2018). On the mutual relation between art experience and viewing time.. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 14(2). 197–208. 8 indexed citations

Brieber, David, et al.. (2017). Cognitive and personality determinants of safe driving performance in professional drivers. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 52. 191–201. 17 indexed citations

Hessler, Johannes, et al.. (2017). Applying Psycholinguistic Evidence to the Construction of a New Test of Verbal Memory in Late-Life Cognitive Decline: The Auditory Wordlist Learning Test. Assessment. 26(4). 743–755.

Brieber, David, Helmut Leder, & Marcos Nadal. (2015). The Experience of Art in Museums. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 33(1). 95–105. 30 indexed citations

Brieber, David, Marcos Nadal, Helmut Leder, & Raphaël Rosenberg. (2014). Art in Time and Space: Context Modulates the Relation between Art Experience and Viewing Time. PLoS ONE. 9(6). e99019–e99019. 175 indexed citations

Leder, Helmut, Gernot Gerger, David Brieber, & Norbert Schwarz. (2014). What makes an art expert? Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation. Cognition & Emotion. 28(6). 1137–1147. 129 indexed citations

10.

Brieber, David, Marcos Nadal, & Helmut Leder. (2014). In the white cube: Museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art. Acta Psychologica. 154. 36–42. 101 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact