Countries citing papers authored by David B. McKeever
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David B. McKeever's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David B. McKeever with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David B. McKeever more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David B. McKeever
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David B. McKeever. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David B. McKeever. The network helps show where David B. McKeever may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David B. McKeever
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David B. McKeever.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David B. McKeever based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David B. McKeever. David B. McKeever is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McKeever, David B.. (2020). Exiled Activism.1 indexed citations
6.
McKeever, David B., et al.. (2015). Wood Products Other Building Materials Used in New Residential Construction in the United States. 1–131.2 indexed citations
McKeever, David B., et al.. (2015). Wood products and other building materials used in new residential construction in Canada, with comparison to previous studies. 1–103.1 indexed citations
10.
McKeever, David B.. (2010). The Human Rights Act and Anti-terrorism in the United Kingdom: One Great Leap Forward by Parliament, but are the Courts Able to Slow the Steady Retreat that has Followed?. Public law. 110–139.1 indexed citations
11.
McKeever, David B. & Robert H. Falk. (2004). Woody residues and solid waste wood available for recovery in the United States, 2002.5 indexed citations
12.
Falk, Robert H. & David B. McKeever. (2004). Recovering wood for reuse and recycling : a United States perspective.25 indexed citations
13.
McKeever, David B.. (2003). Taking inventory of woody residuals. Biocycle. 44(7). 31–35.2 indexed citations
14.
Haynes, Richard W., Darius M. Adams, Ralph J. Alig, et al.. (2001). Projections of the U.S. timber supply and demand situation to 2050 : draft findings from the USDA Forest Service 2000 RPA Timber Assessment..2 indexed citations
15.
McKeever, David B.. (1999). How woody residuals are recycled in the United States. Biocycle: Journal of composting and recycling. 40(12). 33–40.8 indexed citations
16.
McKeever, David B., et al.. (1999). Building codes : obstacle or opportunity?.3 indexed citations
17.
McKeever, David B., et al.. (1996). Value of timber and agricultural products in the United States, 1991. Forest Products Journal. 46(10). 45–50.7 indexed citations
18.
McKeever, David B. & Ryan G. Anderson. (1992). Timber products used to build U.S. single-family houses in 1988. Forest Products Journal. 42(4). 11–18.2 indexed citations
19.
McKeever, David B., et al.. (1983). Wood Used in U.S. Manufacturing Industries, 1977..
20.
McKeever, David B., et al.. (1979). Particleboard, Medium-Density Fiberboard, and Mende Process Board Plants in the United States-Capacity, Production, and Raw Material Trends, 1956-1976.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.