David Armstrong

2.4k total citations
8 papers, 105 citations indexed

About

David Armstrong is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Armstrong has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 105 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 1 paper in Neurology. Recurrent topics in David Armstrong's work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). David Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Protein Structure and Dynamics (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). David Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and United States. David Armstrong's co-authors include Michael Gruenthal, Brian Ault, J. Victor Nadler, Ching M. Wang, Roman Sobotka, Michael P. Williamson, C. Neil Hunter, Mark J. Dickman, Lenka Bučinská and Jana Kopečná and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioinformatics, Frontiers in Plant Science and European Journal of Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

David Armstrong

7 papers receiving 105 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David Armstrong United Kingdom	4	70	62	25	14	9	8	105
Sarah Poliquin United States	9	112 1.6×	123 2.0×	85 3.4×	22 1.6×	2 0.2×	13	273
Asmaa Chakir Italy	3	73 1.0×	23 0.4×	43 1.7×	15 1.1×		4	102
Jim Evans United States	3	112 1.6×	107 1.7×	11 0.4×	14 1.0×		3	161
Felicitas Becker Germany	8	55 0.8×	144 2.3×	66 2.6×	11 0.8×	2 0.2×	12	251
Alessandro Porro Italy	7	73 1.0×	138 2.2×	26 1.0×	13 0.9×		13	207
Luis J. Muñoz Spain	9	113 1.6×	73 1.2×	42 1.7×	26 1.9×		12	175
Sayuri Ishiwata Japan	8	68 1.0×	67 1.1×	12 0.5×	7 0.5×		12	153
Matthew Zemel United States	5	32 0.5×	89 1.4×	35 1.4×	5 0.4×	4 0.4×	6	160
Qingping Zhang China	9	29 0.4×	97 1.6×	27 1.1×	41 2.9×	1 0.1×	12	198
Gerald W. Bourne Canada	7	65 0.9×	97 1.6×	6 0.2×	18 1.3×	1 0.1×	8	348

Countries citing papers authored by David Armstrong

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Armstrong

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Armstrong. The network helps show where David Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Armstrong. David Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Vollmar, M., Santosh Tirunagari, Déborah Harrus, et al.. (2024). Dataset from a human-in-the-loop approach to identify functionally important protein residues from literature. Scientific Data. 11(1). 1032–1032.

2.

Berrisford, John M., Romana Gáborová, Sreenath Nair, et al.. (2023). Annotating Macromolecular Complexes in the Protein Data Bank: Improving the FAIRness of Structure Data. Scientific Data. 10(1). 853–853. 1 indexed citations

3.

Nair, Sreenath, Mihály Váradi, Nurul Nadzirin, et al.. (2021). PDBe aggregated API: programmatic access to an integrative knowledge graph of molecular structure data. Bioinformatics. 37(21). 3950–3952. 9 indexed citations

4.

Armstrong, David, et al.. (2017). ORCID 2017 Community Survey Report. Figshare. 1 indexed citations

5.

Kopečná, Jana, David Armstrong, Lenka Bučinská, et al.. (2016). Synthesis of Chlorophyll-Binding Proteins in a Fully Segregated Δycf54 Strain of the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7. 292–292. 24 indexed citations

6.

Armstrong, David. (2001). Risk information study was marred by poor questionnaire design - Authors' response. Research Portal (King's College London). 51(467). 494–494. 1 indexed citations

7.

Gruenthal, Michael, David Armstrong, Brian Ault, & J. Victor Nadler. (1986). Comparison of seizures and brain lesions produced by intracerebroventricular kainic acid and bicuculline methiodide. Experimental Neurology. 93(3). 621–630. 38 indexed citations

8.

Ault, Brian, Michael Gruenthal, David Armstrong, J. Victor Nadler, & Ching M. Wang. (1986). Baclofen suppresses bursting activity induced in hippocampal slices by differing convulsant treatments. European Journal of Pharmacology. 126(3). 289–292. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact