David A. Ford

468 total citations
17 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

David A. Ford is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, David A. Ford has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Health and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in David A. Ford's work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers). David A. Ford is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers). David A. Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. David A. Ford's co-authors include Jonathan Ashley‐Smith, Kristine M. Gebbie, Matthew Morgan, Erin Smith, Frederick M. Burkle, Cécile M. Bensimon, S. Beatty, Brennen Mills, Natalie Ciccone and Simon M. Laws and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

In The Last Decade

David A. Ford

15 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

David A. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Sociology and Political Science 233
  • Health 211
  • Gender Studies 97
  • Clinical Psychology 55
  • General Health Professions 39
Replace Catriona Mirrlees-Black with:
Catriona Mirrlees-Black
Evangelia Tastsoglou Canada
Elli Nur Hayati Indonesia
Mary Jane McNally Canada
Hayley Boxall Australia
Jordan R. Riddell United States
Holly Johnson Canada
Esther Arenas-Arroyo United States
Barbara J. MacQuarrie Canada
Radha Iyengar United States
Catriona Mirrlees-Black View profile →
Citations per field, relative to David A. Ford
David A. Ford · 1×
Citations per year, relative to David A. Ford
David A. Ford · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by David A. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David A. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David A. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David A. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David A. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David A. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David A. Ford. The network helps show where David A. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David A. Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David A. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David A. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David A. Ford. David A. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 4
3 7
4 8
5
Cambodian Student Competencies in Chemistry at Lower Secondary School Compared to regional neighbors and Japan
1
6 1
7 10
8 5
9 2
10 41
11 0
12 15
13 135
14 0
15
The politics of domain consensus: applications to long-term care.
1
16 66
17 24

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026