This map shows the geographic impact of Darcy Ribeiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Darcy Ribeiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Darcy Ribeiro more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Darcy Ribeiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Darcy Ribeiro. The network helps show where Darcy Ribeiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Darcy Ribeiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Darcy Ribeiro.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Darcy Ribeiro based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Darcy Ribeiro. Darcy Ribeiro is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (2006). El experimento de Brasilia. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 161–180.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1996). O povo brasileiro. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia. 13(2). 245–249.30 indexed citations
4.
Ribeiro, Darcy, et al.. (1993). A fundação do Brasil : testemunhos, 1500-1700.2 indexed citations
5.
Ribeiro, Darcy, et al.. (1992). La fundación de Brasil : testimonios 1500-1700.1 indexed citations
6.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1988). As Américas e a civilização : formação histórica e causas do desenvolvimento desigual dos povos americanos.1 indexed citations
7.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1986). Wildes Utopia : Sehnsucht nach der verlorenen Unschuld : eine Fabel. Suhrkamp eBooks.
8.
Freyre, Gilberto & Darcy Ribeiro. (1985). Casa-grande y senzala : formación de la familia brasileña bajo el régimen de la economía patriarcal : introducción a la historia de la sociedad patriarcal en el Brasil.4 indexed citations
9.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1984). La civilización emergente. Nueva sociedad. 26–37.1 indexed citations
10.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1982). Os índios e a civilização : a integração das populações indígenas no Brasil moderno.47 indexed citations
11.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1980). Uirá sai à procura de Deus : ensaios de etnologia e indigenismo.2 indexed citations
12.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1980). Kadiwéu : ensaios etnológicos sobre o saber, o azar e a beleza.4 indexed citations
13.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1978). O dilema da América Latina : estruturas de poder e forças insurgentes.3 indexed citations
14.
Ribeiro, Darcy, et al.. (1977). Las Americas y la civilización : proceso de formación y causas del desarrollo desigual de los pueblos americanos.9 indexed citations
15.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1975). Configurações histórico-culturais dos povos americanos.3 indexed citations
16.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1975). Teoria do Brasil.3 indexed citations
17.
Ribeiro, Darcy, et al.. (1971). Fronteras indígenas de la civilización.6 indexed citations
18.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1970). As Américas e a civilização : processo de formação e causas do desenvolvimento desigual dos povos americanos.8 indexed citations
19.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1967). La universidad necesaria. Americanae (AECID Library).3 indexed citations
20.
Ribeiro, Darcy. (1962). A política indigenista brasileira.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.