Daphne Vince‐Prue
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Co-authors
- Brian ThomasC. G. GuttridgeRoger R.B. LeakeyR. J. ChancellorR. W. KingP. J. LumsdenE. TafazoliAntony M Jose
- Topics
- Light effects on plants (21 papers)Plant and animal studies (11 papers)Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Daphne Vince‐Prue
39 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Plant Science 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 603
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 278
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 104
- Global and Planetary Change 76
Countries citing papers authored by Daphne Vince‐Prue
This map shows the geographic impact of Daphne Vince‐Prue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphne Vince‐Prue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphne Vince‐Prue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daphne Vince‐Prue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphne Vince‐Prue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphne Vince‐Prue. The network helps show where Daphne Vince‐Prue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daphne Vince‐Prue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daphne Vince‐Prue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daphne Vince‐Prue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daphne Vince‐Prue. Daphne Vince‐Prue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | The Biology of photoreception | 22 |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | Photoperiodism in plantsbreakdown → | 739 |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About Daphne Vince‐Prue
Daphne Vince‐Prue is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Light effects on plants (21 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers) and Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (278 citations) and Molecular Biology (603 citations). Daphne Vince‐Prue has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian Thomas, C. G. Guttridge, Roger R.B. Leakey, R. J. Chancellor, R. W. King, P. J. Lumsden, E. Tafazoli, Antony M Jose, Derek Cosens and David H. Clapham. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Experimental Botany and Plant Cell & Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.