Daowu Pei

1.4k citations
40 papers · 1.0k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daowu Pei

38 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Daowu Pei
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 820
  • Management Science and Operations Research 612
  • Artificial Intelligence 406
  • Statistics and Probability 66
  • Information Systems 102
Replace Nehad N. Morsi with:
Nehad N. Morsi Egypt
Lingqiang Li China
Nobuaki Kuroki Japan
Manuel Ojeda‐Aciego Spain
Sándor Jenei Hungary
Mostafa K. El-Bably Egypt
Junsheng Qiao China
Dexue Zhang China
Violeta Leoreanu-Fotea Romania
Qiu Jin China
Daowu Pei relative to Nehad N. Morsi Egypt Nehad N. Morsi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Nehad N. Morsi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daowu Pei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daowu Pei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daowu Pei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daowu Pei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daowu Pei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daowu Pei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daowu Pei. The network helps show where Daowu Pei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Daowu Pei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daowu Pei Line = papers co-authored together Daowu Pei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005258
2 201099
3 200487
4 200366
5 200765
6 200563
7 201248
8 200239
9 200239
10 201235
11 200733
12 200326
13 201126
14 200624
15 200415
16
FULL IMPLICATION TRIPLE I ALGORITHMS AND THEIR CONSISTENCY IN FUZZY REASONING
200413
17 201313
18 20079
19 20089
20 20038

About Daowu Pei

Daowu Pei is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (30 papers), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (17 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (14 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (9 papers), Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (4 papers) and Advanced Decision-Making Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (820 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (612 citations), Artificial Intelligence (406 citations), Statistics and Probability (66 citations) and Information Systems (102 citations). Daowu Pei has collaborated with scholars based in China and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Duoqian Miao, Zongben Xu, Zhi Pei, Zheng Li, Guojun Wang, Songsong Dai, Donghui Guo, Rui Yang, Young Bae Jun and Jianming Zhan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Information Sciences, International Journal of General Systems and Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact