Danyal Khan
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Anthony F. RossiEvan M. ZahnRedmond P. BurkeDarren P. BermanJohn P. CheathamDoff B. McElhinneyRobert L. HannanJuan M. Bolívar
- Topics
- Congenital Heart Disease Studies (13 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers)Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American College of CardiologyScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Danyal Khan
27 papers receiving 477 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Epidemiology 338
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 244
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 187
- Surgery 156
- Biomedical Engineering 58
Countries citing papers authored by Danyal Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Danyal Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danyal Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danyal Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danyal Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danyal Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danyal Khan. The network helps show where Danyal Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danyal Khan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danyal Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danyal Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danyal Khan. Danyal Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 117 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Danyal Khan
Danyal Khan is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Internal Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (13 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (244 citations), Epidemiology (338 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (187 citations). Danyal Khan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony F. Rossi, Evan M. Zahn, Redmond P. Burke, Darren P. Berman, John P. Cheatham, Doff B. McElhinney, Robert L. Hannan, Juan M. Bolívar, Philip A. Roberts and Michael D. Ezekowitz. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.