Danielle Schubbe
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Oncology
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Renata W. YenGlyn ElwynCatherine SaundersPeter ScaliaMarie‐Anne DurandSarah CohenMaria van den MuijsenberghRachel C Forcino
- Topics
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers)Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEThe American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Danielle Schubbe
14 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- General Health Professions 132
- Economics and Econometrics 63
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 50
- Oncology 34
- Epidemiology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Schubbe
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Schubbe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Schubbe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Schubbe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Schubbe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Schubbe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Schubbe. The network helps show where Danielle Schubbe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle Schubbe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle Schubbe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle Schubbe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle Schubbe. Danielle Schubbe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 100 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 18 |
About Danielle Schubbe
Danielle Schubbe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (132 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Family Practice (10 citations). Danielle Schubbe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Renata W. Yen, Glyn Elwyn, Catherine Saunders, Peter Scalia, Marie‐Anne Durand, Sarah Cohen, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Marie‐Anne Durand, Rachel C Forcino and A. James O’Malley. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.