Danielle Ianzer

38 papers receiving 904 citations

Peers

Danielle Ianzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Microbiology 192
  • Genetics 499
  • Virology 67
  • Pharmacology 165
  • Molecular Biology 518
Replace Zoltan Dekan with:
Zoltan Dekan Australia
Elena V. Kryukova Russia
М. Н. Жмак Russia
Katherine J. Nielsen Australia
C. C. Chang Taiwan
Carole Fruchart‐Gaillard France
Emmanuel Jover France
Yanni K.‐Y. Chin Australia
Laure Guilhaudis France
Marcelo J. Alfonzo Venezuela
Danielle Ianzer relative to Zoltan Dekan Australia Zoltan Dekan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Zoltan Dekan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Ianzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Ianzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Ianzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Ianzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Ianzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Ianzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Ianzer. The network helps show where Danielle Ianzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Ianzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Ianzer Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Ianzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011121
2 2004101
3 200276
4 200868
5 200368
6 201265
7 200748
8 201336
9 200730
10 201330
11 201329
12 200627
13 200626
14 200721
15 201120
16 201718
17 201017
18 201813
19 200811
20 201410

About Danielle Ianzer

Danielle Ianzer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 913 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (16 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (8 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (8 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (7 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (192 citations), Genetics (499 citations), Virology (67 citations), Pharmacology (165 citations) and Molecular Biology (518 citations). Danielle Ianzer has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Antônio Carlos Martins de Camargo, Solange M.T. Serrano, Juliano R. Guerreiro, Robson A.S. Santos, Carlos Henrique Xavier, Fernanda Calheta Vieira Portaro, Katsuhiro Konno, Vincent Dive, Mirian A.F. Hayashi and Daniel C. Pimenta. Their work appears in journals such as Peptides, Toxicon, The FASEB Journal, Biochemical Pharmacology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact