Danielle Dewar‐Darch

973 citations
9 papers · 733 · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Dewar‐Darch

9 papers receiving 728 citations

Hit Papers

A Global Protein Kinase and Phosphatase Interaction Network in Yeast 2010 · 512 citations
5120+5+10Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Danielle Dewar‐Darch
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 79
  • Cell Biology 164
  • Aging 17
  • Molecular Biology 563
  • Spectroscopy 86
Replace Michael P. Cusack with:
Michael P. Cusack United States
Tine Skovgaard Denmark
Yu-Yi Lin Taiwan
Matteo Barberis Netherlands
Pasquale Zizza Italy
Christoph F. Kurat Canada
Jin-ying Lu United States
Heejun Hwang South Korea
Safia Thaminy Switzerland
Lena Böttinger Germany
Danielle Dewar‐Darch relative to Michael P. Cusack United States Michael P. Cusack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Michael P. Cusack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Dewar‐Darch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Dewar‐Darch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Dewar‐Darch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Dewar‐Darch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Dewar‐Darch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Dewar‐Darch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Dewar‐Darch. The network helps show where Danielle Dewar‐Darch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Dewar‐Darch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Dewar‐Darch Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Dewar‐Darch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
A Global Protein Kinase and Phosphatase Interaction Network in Yeast
Hit paper breakdown →
2010512
2 201365
3 201554
4 201151
5 200731
6 201311
7 20176
8 20142
9 20181

About Danielle Dewar‐Darch

Danielle Dewar‐Darch is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (6 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (4 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (1 paper), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (1 paper), Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism (1 paper), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper) and Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (79 citations), Cell Biology (164 citations), Aging (17 citations), Molecular Biology (563 citations) and Spectroscopy (86 citations). Danielle Dewar‐Darch has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mike Tyers, Ashton Breitkreutz, Teresa Reguly, Zhen-Yuan Lin, Ricardo Almeida, Guomin Liu, Jeffrey R. Sharom, Alexey I. Nesvizhskii, Xiaojing Tang and Anne‐Claude Gingras. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The FASEB Journal, Experimental Cell Research, PLoS Computational Biology and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact