Danielle Bargh
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Gin S. MalhiCarissa CoulstonPritha DasMichael BerkMichael GitlinMark A. FryeMichelle TaniousLisa Lampe
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)
- Journals
- Biological PsychiatryJournal of Affective DisordersAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Danielle Bargh
13 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Psychiatry and Mental health 194
- Clinical Psychology 111
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
- Sociology and Political Science 28
- Pharmacology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Bargh
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Bargh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Bargh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Bargh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Bargh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Bargh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Bargh. The network helps show where Danielle Bargh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle Bargh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle Bargh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle Bargh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle Bargh. Danielle Bargh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 29 |
About Danielle Bargh
Danielle Bargh is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Family Practice and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (194 citations), Biological Psychiatry (19 citations) and Clinical Psychology (111 citations). Danielle Bargh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Gin S. Malhi, Carissa Coulston, Pritha Das, Michael Berk, Michael Gitlin, Mark A. Frye, Michelle Tanious, Lisa Lampe, Hugh Morgan and Anna R. McAlister. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.