Daniela Tusi Braga
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Aristides Volpato CordioliGisele Gus ManfroGuilherme Welter WendtElisabeth MeyerBarbara Van NoppenMichele T. PatoElizeth HeldtYgor Arzeno Ferrão
- Topics
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (14 papers)Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniela Tusi Braga
13 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Clinical Psychology 279
- Cognitive Neuroscience 108
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
- Psychiatry and Mental health 28
- Social Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Tusi Braga
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Tusi Braga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Tusi Braga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Tusi Braga more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Tusi Braga
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Tusi Braga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Tusi Braga. The network helps show where Daniela Tusi Braga may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Tusi Braga
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Tusi Braga. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Tusi Braga based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Tusi Braga. Daniela Tusi Braga is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | Qualidade de vida em indivíduos com transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo: revisão da literatura Quality of life in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review | 2 |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | Crenças disfuncionais e o modelo cognitivo-comportamental no transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo | 0 |
About Daniela Tusi Braga
Daniela Tusi Braga is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (14 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (279 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (108 citations). Daniela Tusi Braga has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aristides Volpato Cordioli, Gisele Gus Manfro, Guilherme Welter Wendt, Elisabeth Meyer, Barbara Van Noppen, Michele T. Pato, Elizeth Heldt, Ygor Arzeno Ferrão, Flávio Kapczinski and Daniela Vicente Bavaresco. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Depression and Anxiety.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.