Daniela Schwab

570 total citations
20 papers, 430 citations indexed

About

Daniela Schwab is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniela Schwab has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 430 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Daniela Schwab's work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). Daniela Schwab is often cited by papers focused on Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). Daniela Schwab collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Slovenia and Germany. Daniela Schwab's co-authors include Anne Schienle, Andréas Fink, Ilona Papousek, Mathias Benedek, Elisabeth M. Weiss, Saskia Jaarsveld, Thomas Lachmann, Martin Arendasy, Saša Zorjan and Wilfried Scharmüller and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Brain Research and Clinical Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Daniela Schwab

20 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniela Schwab Austria 11 295 266 64 60 58 20 430
George Georgiou United Kingdom 8 122 0.4× 175 0.7× 48 0.8× 12 0.2× 92 1.6× 14 317
Valérie La Buissonnière-Ariza United States 13 206 0.7× 107 0.4× 39 0.6× 72 1.2× 175 3.0× 27 392
Mirtha Ferrer United States 7 101 0.3× 96 0.4× 53 0.8× 66 1.1× 132 2.3× 7 478
Amy Browning United Kingdom 5 212 0.7× 126 0.5× 67 1.0× 130 2.2× 39 0.7× 5 378
Aleksandra Mroczko-Wąsowicz Germany 7 202 0.7× 182 0.7× 88 1.4× 109 1.8× 23 0.4× 12 364
Mary Jane Spiller United Kingdom 10 203 0.7× 271 1.0× 72 1.1× 123 2.0× 50 0.9× 17 377
Peter G. Grossenbacher United States 7 424 1.4× 438 1.6× 201 3.1× 241 4.0× 58 1.0× 8 713
Rafaela R. Campagnoli Brazil 10 163 0.6× 142 0.5× 86 1.3× 25 0.4× 67 1.2× 18 335
Richard M. Piech United Kingdom 8 163 0.6× 90 0.3× 48 0.8× 58 1.0× 79 1.4× 13 312
Deb Vansteenwegen Belgium 6 196 0.7× 149 0.6× 94 1.5× 60 1.0× 60 1.0× 12 342

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Schwab

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Schwab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Schwab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Schwab more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Schwab

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Schwab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Schwab. The network helps show where Daniela Schwab may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Schwab

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Schwab. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Schwab based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Schwab. Daniela Schwab is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schienle, Anne, et al.. (2022). Changes in neural processing and evaluation of negative facial expressions after administration of an open-label placebo. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 6577–6577. 15 indexed citations
2.
Schienle, Anne, et al.. (2020). Placebos can change affective contexts: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology. 150. 107843–107843. 7 indexed citations
3.
Zorjan, Saša, Daniela Schwab, & Anne Schienle. (2020). The effects of imaginary eating on visual food cue reactivity: An event-related potential study. Appetite. 153. 104743–104743. 8 indexed citations
4.
Schienle, Anne, et al.. (2020). Self-Disgust and Its Relationship With Lifetime Suicidal Ideation and Behavior. Crisis. 41(5). 344–350. 19 indexed citations
5.
Schwab, Daniela, Saša Zorjan, & Anne Schienle. (2020). Face the food: Food plating with facial patterns influences appetite and event-related brain potentials. Motivation and Emotion. 45(1). 95–102. 9 indexed citations
6.
Schienle, Anne & Daniela Schwab. (2019). Disgust Proneness and Personal Space in Children. Evolutionary Psychology. 17(3). 2128985614–2128985614. 2 indexed citations
7.
Wabnegger, Albert, Daniela Schwab, & Anne Schienle. (2019). The hole story: an event-related potential study with trypophobic stimuli. Motivation and Emotion. 43(6). 985–992. 7 indexed citations
8.
Wabnegger, Albert, Daniela Schwab, & Anne Schienle. (2018). Aversive aftertaste changes visual food cue reactivity: An fMRI study on cross-modal perception. Neuroscience Letters. 673. 56–60. 6 indexed citations
9.
Schwab, Daniela, et al.. (2018). Placebo effects in spider phobia: an eye-tracking experiment. Cognition & Emotion. 32(8). 1571–1577. 16 indexed citations
10.
Schienle, Anne, Wilfried Scharmüller, & Daniela Schwab. (2017). Processing of visual food cues during bitter taste perception in female patients with binge-eating symptoms: A cross-modal ERP study. Clinical Neurophysiology. 128(11). 2184–2190. 13 indexed citations
11.
Leutgeb, Verena, et al.. (2017). Is this blood? An ERP study on the visual identification of red fluids in patients with blood phobia. Brain Research. 1678. 195–202. 5 indexed citations
12.
Schienle, Anne, et al.. (2017). Influence of Bitter Taste on Affective Facial Processing: An ERP Study. Chemical Senses. 42(6). 473–478. 6 indexed citations
13.
Schwab, Daniela & Anne Schienle. (2017). Facial emotion processing in pediatric social anxiety disorder: Relevance of situational context. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 50. 40–46. 14 indexed citations
14.
Schwab, Daniela & Anne Schienle. (2017). Facial affect processing in social anxiety disorder with early onset: evidence of an intensity amplification bias. Social Neuroscience. 13(3). 318–327. 14 indexed citations
15.
Schwab, Daniela, et al.. (2016). Disgust evoked by strong wormwood bitterness influences the processing of visual food cues in women: An ERP study. Appetite. 108. 51–56. 31 indexed citations
16.
Jaarsveld, Saskia, et al.. (2015). Intelligence in creative processes: An EEG study. Intelligence. 49. 171–178. 60 indexed citations
17.
Schienle, Anne, Martin Arendasy, & Daniela Schwab. (2015). Disgust Responses to Bitter Compounds: the Role of Disgust Sensitivity. Chemosensory Perception. 8(4). 167–173. 17 indexed citations
18.
Schwab, Daniela, Mathias Benedek, Ilona Papousek, Elisabeth M. Weiss, & Andréas Fink. (2014). The time-course of EEG alpha power changes in creative ideation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 310–310. 99 indexed citations
19.
Weber, Patricia C, et al.. (2012). First and second language in the brain: Neuronal correlates of language processing and spelling strategies. Brain and Language. 124(1). 22–33. 2 indexed citations
20.
Fink, Andréas, Daniela Schwab, & Ilona Papousek. (2011). Sensitivity of EEG upper alpha activity to cognitive and affective creativity interventions. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 82(3). 233–239. 80 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by George Georgiou Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Valérie La Buissonnière-Ariza Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mirtha Ferrer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amy Browning Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aleksandra Mroczko-Wąsowicz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Jane Spiller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter G. Grossenbacher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rafaela R. Campagnoli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard M. Piech Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deb Vansteenwegen
Rankless by CCL
2026