Daniela Sapienza

41 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Daniela Sapienza
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Chemical Health and Safety 8
  • Pharmacy 25
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 44
  • Cancer Research 46
  • Emergency Medicine 29
Replace Christopher Pool with:
Christopher Pool United States
Alessandra De Matteis Italy
Emanuela Ferretti Canada
Niels Maltbæk Denmark
Janet H. Evans United States
Cristina Salvatori Italy
H Joyce United Kingdom
Zhichun Feng China
Martin MacDonald Australia
Signe Timm Denmark
Daniela Sapienza relative to Christopher Pool United States Christopher Pool's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Christopher Pool · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Sapienza

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Sapienza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Sapienza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Sapienza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Sapienza

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Sapienza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Sapienza. The network helps show where Daniela Sapienza may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Sapienza, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Sapienza Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Sapienza links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201128
2 201826
3 202122
4 201121
5 201918
6 202014
7 201713
8 202413
9 202012
10 200911
11 201911
12 20219
13 20236
14 20226
15 20206
16 20246
17 20245
18 20205
19 20245
20
Glutathione S-transferase M1/T1 genotype and melanoma in a Southern Italian population: a case-control study.
20165

About Daniela Sapienza

Daniela Sapienza is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Surgery, having authored 44 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (5 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (5 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (4 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (4 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (8 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (44 citations), Cancer Research (46 citations) and Emergency Medicine (29 citations). Daniela Sapienza has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Albania and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Alessio Asmundo, Cristina Mondello, Elvira Ventura Spagnolo, Mariella Carrieri, Giovanna Spatari, Giovanna Tranfo, Maurizio Manno, Maria Luisa Scapellato, Giovanni Battista Bartolucci and Antonio Bottari. Their work appears in journals such as Legal Medicine, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Toxicology Letters and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact