Daniela Medas

48 papers receiving 793 citations

Peers

Daniela Medas
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 190
  • Pollution 362
  • Environmental Chemistry 245
  • Biomaterials 111
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 98
Replace L.T.C. Bonten with:
L.T.C. Bonten Netherlands
Marilyne Soubrand France
Christopher J. Matocha United States
Jianhong Liang China
Leonard Osté Netherlands
Jason W. Stuckey United States
Qingman Li China
Péter Sipos Hungary
Hui Tong China
Francisco Ruíz Brazil
Daniela Medas relative to L.T.C. Bonten Netherlands L.T.C. Bonten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
L.T.C. Bonten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Medas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Medas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Medas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Medas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Medas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Medas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Medas. The network helps show where Daniela Medas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Medas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Medas Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Medas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015113
2 201643
3 201539
4 202037
5 201732
6 201332
7 201529
8 202128
9 201326
10 201326
11 201226
12 201726
13 201425
14 201723
15 201922
16 201722
17 202119
18 201419
19 202018
20 202017

About Daniela Medas

Daniela Medas is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Pollution, Geochemistry and Petrology, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 49 papers that have together received 803 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mine drainage and remediation techniques (21 papers), Heavy metals in environment (20 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (11 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (8 papers), Arsenic contamination and mitigation (7 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (6 papers), Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition (5 papers) and Iron oxide chemistry and applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (190 citations), Pollution (362 citations), Environmental Chemistry (245 citations), Biomaterials (111 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (98 citations). Daniela Medas has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni De Giudici, Rosa Cidu, Francesca Podda, Richard B. Wanty, Carlo Meneghini, Pierfranco Lattanzi, Franco Frau, Stefania Da Pelo, Maria Antonietta Casu and Alessandra Gianoncelli. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Geochemistry, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Chemical Geology and Water Air & Soil Pollution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact