Daniela Hubl
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 18
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 15
- Neural dynamics and brain function 11
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 11
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 9
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 15
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 10
- Neurology top 2%
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications 13
- Co-authors
- Thomas DierksWerner StrikThomas KoenigAndrea FederspielJochen KindlerFritz PoustkaSven BölteSabine Feineis-Matthews
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniela Hubl
66 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 991
- Neurology 345
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 693
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 337
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Hubl
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Hubl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Hubl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Hubl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Hubl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Hubl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Hubl. The network helps show where Daniela Hubl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Hubl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 177 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 73 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 108 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 24 |
About Daniela Hubl
Daniela Hubl is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Philosophy and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (18 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (15 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.8k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (991 citations), Neurology (345 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (693 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (337 citations). Daniela Hubl has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Dierks, Werner Strik, Thomas Koenig, Andrea Federspiel, Jochen Kindler, Fritz Poustka, Sven Bölte, Sabine Feineis-Matthews, E. Roy John and Lars‐Olof Wahlund. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Schizophrenia Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Clinical Neurophysiology and Brain Topography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.