Daniela Anker

15 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

Daniela Anker
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 70
  • Family Practice 5
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 59
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 17
  • Physiology 22
Replace Stephen J Woolford with:
Stephen J Woolford United Kingdom
Ingeborg M.J.A. Kuper Netherlands
Rocío Menéndez Colino Spain
Estelle Lowry United Kingdom
Clare Hambling United Kingdom
Federica Sganga Italy
Rocky Tang United States
Carlos Hernández-Quiles Spain
Linda P. Bolin United States
Kirstyn James Ireland
Daniela Anker relative to Stephen J Woolford United Kingdom Stephen J Woolford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Stephen J Woolford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Anker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Anker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Anker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Anker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Anker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Anker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Anker. The network helps show where Daniela Anker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Anker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Anker Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Anker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201846
2 202042
3 201934
4 202027
5 20219
6 20196
7 20206
8 20216
9 20225
10 20214
11 20223
12 20223
13 20223
14 20222
15
Risk Factors in the First 1000 Days of Life and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Children : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
20191

About Daniela Anker

Daniela Anker is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 15 papers that have together received 197 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (70 citations), Family Practice (5 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (59 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (17 citations) and Physiology (22 citations). Daniela Anker has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arnaud Chioléro, Nicolas Rodondi, Valérie Santschi, Christina Wolfson, Brigitte Santos‐Eggimann, Cinzia Del Giovane, Marcel Zwahlen, Bruno R. da Costa, Magali Leyvraz and Nicole Sekarski. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pediatrics, BMC Medicine, Public health reviews, Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada and Frontiers in Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact