Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci
- Oncology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Co-authors
- Tanios Bekaii‐SaabEmily ChanVeena ShankaranRavit GevaMinori KoshijiShilpa GuptaJared LuncefordJonathan D. Cheng
- Topics
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers)Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci
19 papers receiving 511 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Oncology 365
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 271
- Surgery 167
- Molecular Biology 112
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 106
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci. The network helps show where Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci. Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 120 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 90 | |
| 7 | 92 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1 |
About Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci
Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers) and Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (74 citations), Oncology (365 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (271 citations). Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Tanios Bekaii‐Saab, Emily Chan, Veena Shankaran, Ravit Geva, Minori Koshiji, Shilpa Gupta, Jared Lunceford, Jonathan D. Cheng, Raanan Berger and Kei Muro. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.